Shloka 19
Pañcahotṛ-Vidhāna and the Dispute of the Five Vāyus (पञ्चहोतृविधानम् — पञ्चवायूनां श्रेष्ठत्वविवादः)
मयि प्रलीने प्रलयं व्रजन्ति सर्वे प्राणा: प्राणभूतां शरीरे । मयि प्रचीर्णे च पुनश्चरन्ति श्रेष्ठो हाहं पश्यत मां प्रलीनम्
mayi pralīne pralayaṁ vrajanti sarve prāṇāḥ prāṇabhūtāṁ śarīre | mayi pracīrṇe ca punaś caranti śreṣṭho hāhaṁ paśyata māṁ pralīnam ||
Wika ng Brahmana: “Kapag ako’y nalulusaw, ang lahat ng hiningang-buhay—na siyang buhay sa katawan ng mga nilalang na may laman—ay nalulusaw rin sa katawan. At kapag ako’y muling kumilos, silang lahat ay muling kumikilos. Kaya ako ang pinakapanguna. Masdan—ngayon ay pumapasok ako sa pagkalusaw (at kasunod nito, ang pagkalusaw ninyo’y darating din).”
(ब्राह्मण उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse asserts the dependence of all embodied life-functions (prāṇas) on a governing principle identified here as the speaker’s ‘I’: when that principle withdraws, the prāṇas cease; when it becomes active, they function again. It frames a hierarchy in which the animating principle is ‘foremost’ because it conditions the operation of the vital breaths.
In a didactic exchange, the brāhmaṇa speaker makes a demonstrative claim of superiority by describing (and theatrically indicating) his own ‘dissolution’ and ‘re-emergence,’ using it to show that the prāṇas in the body follow his state—ceasing when he withdraws and moving when he moves.