Shloka 3
ब्राह्मणपूजा-राजधर्मः | Royal Duty of Honoring Learned Brahmins
सत्पुरुषोंमें श्रेष्ठ पितामह! परंतु सुना जाता है कि पूर्वकालमें विश्वामित्रजीने इसी शरीरसे ब्राह्मणत्व प्राप्त कर लिया था और आप जो उसे सर्वथा दुर्लभ बता रहे हैं (ये दोनों बातें परस्पर विरुद्ध-सी जान पड़ती हैं) ।।
Yudhiṣṭhira uvāca: Satpuruṣeṣu śreṣṭha pitāmaha! śrūyate ca purākāle Viśvāmitro ’nenaiva śarīreṇa brāhmaṇatvaṃ prāptavān iti; bhavatā ca tad atyanta-durlabham ucyate—etad ubhayaṃ paraspara-virodham iva pratibhāti. Vītahavyaś ca nṛpatiḥ śruto me vipratāṃ gataḥ. Tad eva tāvad, Gādeya, śrotum icchāmy ahaṃ vibho.
Sinabi ni Yudhiṣṭhira: “Lolo, pinakamainam sa mga banal! Ngunit nababalitaan na noong unang panahon, si Viśvāmitra ay nagkamit ng kalagayang Brahmana sa mismong katawang ito; samantalang sinasabi mo namang napakahirap at bihirang makamtan iyon—tila magkasalungat ang dalawang pahayag. Narinig ko rin na si Haring Vītahavya, bagaman isang Kṣatriya, ay naging Brahmana. O inapo ni Gādhi, makapangyarihan—ang salaysay na iyon ang nais kong marinig muna.”
युधिछिर उवाच
Educational Q&A
Yudhiṣṭhira probes the relationship between birth-based identity and merit-based attainment: if Brahminhood is said to be rare, how do traditions of Viśvāmitra and Vītahavya becoming Brahmins fit? The verse frames a dharmic inquiry into whether spiritual/ethical excellence (tapas, conduct) can transform one’s social-religious status.
In the Anuśāsana discussions, Yudhiṣṭhira addresses Bhīṣma and raises an apparent contradiction in what is ‘heard’ in tradition. He cites two famous examples—Viśvāmitra and King Vītahavya—and asks Bhīṣma to narrate first the account of Vītahavya’s transformation.