Skanda’s Svastyayana and the Slaying of Taraka and Mahisha
ततो गुहः प्राह हरिं सुरेशं मोहेन नष्टो भगवन् विवेकः भ्राता मया मातुलजो निरस्तस्तस्मात् करिष्ये स्वशरीरशोषम्
tato guhaḥ prāha hariṃ sureśaṃ mohena naṣṭo bhagavan vivekaḥ bhrātā mayā mātulajo nirastastasmāt kariṣye svaśarīraśoṣam
แล้วคุหะกล่าวต่อหริ ผู้เป็นจอมแห่งเทพว่า “ข้าแต่พระผู้เป็นเจ้า ด้วยความหลงทำให้ปัญญาแยกแยะของข้าพินาศ ข้าได้ขับไล่พี่น้องของข้า ผู้เป็นบุตรของน้าชายฝ่ายมารดา ดังนั้นข้าจะบำเพ็ญตบะให้กายของตนร่อยหรอ”
{ "primaryRasa": "karuna", "secondaryRasa": "shanta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
Guha admits that under moha (delusion) he expelled a close kin—specifically a mātulaja (maternal-uncle’s son). In Purāṇic ethics, harming or dishonoring family/kin is a serious adharma; the text highlights that such acts arise when viveka (moral discrimination) collapses under passion, anger, or confusion.
It denotes extreme self-mortification—fasting or austerities aimed at ‘drying’ the body. Many Purāṇas acknowledge tapas, but frequently redirect penitents toward regulated prāyaścitta, especially tīrtha-snāna and devotion, as safer and dharmically balanced means of purification.
In tīrtha-mahātmyas, the deity who grants the remedy is often praised with sovereignty titles. Calling Viṣṇu ‘sureśa’ underscores his authority to prescribe expiation and confer restoration of fortune and radiance, which the next verses explicitly promise.