Shloka 43
Sati's Death & Virabhadra — Sati’s Death and the Assault on Daksha’s Sacrifice: Virabhadra versus the Devas
ते तस्य कायमासाद्य अमोघा वै हरेः शराः निपेतुर्भुवि भग्नाशा नास्तिकादिव याचकाः
te tasya kāyamāsādya amoghā vai hareḥ śarāḥ nipeturbhuvi bhagnāśā nāstikādiva yācakāḥ
ศรอันไม่พลาดของพระหริ แม้จะถึงกายของเขาแล้วก็กลับสิ้นเป้าหมายและตกลงสู่พื้นดิน—ดุจยาจกที่กลับไปอย่างสิ้นหวังจากคนไร้ศรัทธา
{ "primaryRasa": "adbhuta", "secondaryRasa": "hasya", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
FAQs
Even what is called “amogha” (infallible) may appear to fail when opposed by a higher dispensation; the verse underscores that efficacy is not merely mechanical power but is governed by dharma and the divine order. The simile of beggars rejected by a nāstika highlights the frustration of expectation when the receiving side is closed or protected.
Primarily within Vamśānucarita / carita-style narration (episode narrative about divine figures and their deeds), rather than sarga/pratisarga. It is a martial micro-episode embedded in the broader mythic account.
The ‘falling’ of Hari’s arrows after contact suggests a theology of parity/constraint between sectarian powers: Viṣṇu’s weaponry meets a limit in the presence of Śiva’s manifestation (Vīrabhadra), preparing the ground for a non-sectarian resolution where neither deity is reduced to mere inferiority.