Jabali Bound on the Banyan Tree and Nandayanti’s Appeal at Sri-Kantha on the Yamuna
ततः सा प्राह तमृषिं यथातथ्यं कृशोदरी श्रुत्वार्षिः कोपमगमदशपच्छिल्पिनां वपम्
tataḥ sā prāha tamṛṣiṃ yathātathyaṃ kṛśodarī śrutvārṣiḥ kopamagamadaśapacchilpināṃ vapam
แล้วสตรีผู้มีเอวอรชรได้เล่าเรื่องทั้งหมดแก่ฤๅษีผู้นั้นตามที่เกิดขึ้นจริง; ครั้นฤๅษีได้ฟังแล้ว ก็เกิดความกริ้วต่อช่างผู้ทำบาป และต่อการกระทำ/สภาพอันน่าเวทนานั้น.
{ "primaryRasa": "raudra", "secondaryRasa": "karuna", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
It establishes the maiden’s testimony as reliable, legitimizing the sage’s subsequent curse as dharmically grounded rather than impulsive or based on hearsay.
Within Purāṇic storytelling, ‘śilpin’ can denote craftsmen involved in a morally compromised act (e.g., coercion, deception, or illicit arrangement). The verse frames them as culpable agents whose wrongdoing triggers ascetic retribution.
In many tīrtha-māhātmyas, a sage’s curse/boon becomes the etiological mechanism that explains a local feature, a transformation, or a rule of conduct associated with the sacred landscape.