Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 12

Bhṛgu–Bharadvāja-saṃvāda: Vānaprastha-parivrājaka-ācāra, Abhaya-dharma, and Lokānāṃ Vibhāga (Śānti-parva 185)

वाय्वग्न्यशनिनिर्घोषै: फल पुष्पं विशीर्यते । श्रोत्रेण गृहते शब्दस्तस्माच्छुण्वन्ति पादपा:,यह भी देखा जाता है कि वायु, अग्नि और बिजलीकी कड़क आदि भीषण शब्द होनेपर वृक्षोंक फल-फ़ूल झड़कर गिर जाते हैं। शब्दका ग्रहण तो श्रवणेन्द्रियसे ही होता है; इससे यह सिद्ध हुआ कि वृक्ष भी सुनते हैं

vāyv-agny-aśani-nirghoṣaiḥ phala-puṣpaṃ viśīryate | śrotreṇa gṛhyate śabdas tasmāc chṛṇvanti pādapāḥ ||

ภรทวาชกล่าวว่า “ด้วยเสียงคำรามของลม ไฟ และอสนีบาต ผลและดอกของต้นไม้ย่อมสั่นสะเทือนแล้วร่วงหล่น เสียงนั้นย่อมถูกรับรู้ด้วยอินทรีย์แห่งการได้ยิน ฉะนั้นจึงเป็นที่ตั้งมั่นว่า ต้นไม้ก็ได้ยินเช่นกัน”

वायु-अग्नि-अशनि-निर्घोषैःby the roars/sounds of wind, fire, and lightning
वायु-अग्नि-अशनि-निर्घोषैः:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootवायु + अग्नि + अशनि + निर्घोष
FormMasculine, Instrumental, Plural
फलम्fruit
फलम्:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootफल
FormNeuter, Nominative, Singular
पुष्पम्flower
पुष्पम्:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootपुष्प
FormNeuter, Nominative, Singular
विशीर्यतेis scattered / falls off
विशीर्यते:
Karma
TypeVerb
Rootशॄ (शीर्ण/शीर्यते)
FormPresent, 3rd, Singular, Atmanepada, Passive/Impersonal (bhāve)
श्रोत्रेणby the ear (organ of hearing)
श्रोत्रेण:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootश्रोत्र
FormNeuter, Instrumental, Singular
गृह्यतेis grasped / is perceived
गृह्यते:
Karma
TypeVerb
Rootग्रह्
FormPresent, 3rd, Singular, Atmanepada, Passive
शब्दःsound
शब्दः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootशब्द
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
तस्मात्therefore / from that (reason)
तस्मात्:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootतस्मात् (तद्-प्रातिपदिक)
शृण्वन्तिhear
शृण्वन्ति:
Karta
TypeVerb
Rootश्रु
FormPresent, 3rd, Plural, Parasmaipada
पादपाःtrees
पादपाः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootपादप
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural

भरद्वाज उवाच

B
Bharadvāja
W
wind (vāyu)
F
fire (agni)
T
thunderbolt/lightning (aśani)
T
trees (pādapāḥ)
F
fruits (phala)
F
flowers (puṣpa)
S
sound (śabda)
E
ear/organ of hearing (śrotra)

Educational Q&A

The verse argues from observable effect (trees shedding fruits/flowers when exposed to loud natural sounds) to a philosophical conclusion: since sound is known through the faculty of hearing, trees must possess some capacity to apprehend sound—an assertion of non-human sensory capability.

Bharadvāja presents a reasoning example within a didactic discussion: he cites the reaction of trees to the loud roar of wind, fire, and thunder as evidence supporting the claim that trees can ‘hear’ (i.e., respond to sound through an appropriate faculty).