Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 18

Adhyāya 166: Kṛtaghna-doṣa (कृतघ्नदोषः) — the fault of ingratitude and the limits of expiation

न ब्राह्मणो निवेदेत किंचिद्‌ राजनि वेदवित्‌ । स्ववीर्याद्‌ राजवीर्याच्च स्ववीर्य बलवत्तरम्‌,वेदज्ञ ब्राह्यणको चाहिये कि वह राजाके निकट अपनी आवश्यकता निवेदन न करे; क्योंकि ब्राह्मणकी अपनी शक्ति तथा राजाकी शक्तिमेंसे उसकी अपनी ही शक्ति प्रबल है

na brāhmaṇo nivedet kiñcid rājani vedavit | svavīryād rājavīryāc ca svavīryaṃ balavattaram ||

ภีษมะกล่าวว่า— พราหมณ์ผู้รู้พระเวทไม่ควรทูลขอสิ่งใดต่อพระราชา เพราะเมื่อเทียบกำลังของพราหมณ์กับกำลังของกษัตริย์แล้ว กำลังของพราหมณ์เองยิ่งใหญ่กว่า.

not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
ब्राह्मणःa Brahmin
ब्राह्मणः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootब्राह्मण
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
निवेदेतshould submit / should request
निवेदेत:
TypeVerb
Rootनि+विद्
FormVidhi-ling (Optative), Present-system, 3rd, Singular, Parasmaipada
किञ्चित्anything
किञ्चित्:
Karma
TypePronoun
Rootकिञ्चित्
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
राजनिto/at a king (in the king's presence)
राजनि:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootराजन्
FormMasculine, Locative, Singular
वेदवित्knower of the Veda
वेदवित्:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootवेदविद्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
स्ववीर्यात्from (his) own power/valor
स्ववीर्यात्:
Apadana
TypeNoun
Rootस्ववीर्य
FormNeuter, Ablative, Singular
राजवीर्यात्from the king's power/valor
राजवीर्यात्:
Apadana
TypeNoun
Rootराजवीर्य
FormNeuter, Ablative, Singular
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
स्ववीर्यम्(his) own power/valor
स्ववीर्यम्:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootस्ववीर्य
FormNeuter, Nominative, Singular
बलवत्तरम्stronger
बलवत्तरम्:
TypeAdjective
Rootबलवत्
FormNeuter, Nominative, Singular, Comparative

भीष्म उवाच

B
Bhīṣma
B
brāhmaṇa (Brahmin)
R
rājan (king)
V
Veda

Educational Q&A

A Veda-knowing Brahmin should maintain dignity and independence, not seeking favors from kings; spiritual and moral power (rooted in knowledge and discipline) is presented as superior to mere political or military power.

In the Śānti Parva’s dharma-instruction, Bhīṣma advises on proper conduct and social-ethical order, contrasting the Brahmin’s inner authority with the king’s external authority and urging restraint in approaching royal patronage.