Shloka 3
Aṣṭāvakra–Strī-saṃvāda: Dhṛti, hospitality, and a dispute on autonomy
संदेह: सुमहानेष विरुद्ध इति मे मतिः । इह यः सहधर्मों वै प्रेत्यायं विहितः क्व नु
saṁdehaḥ sumahān eṣa viruddha iti me matiḥ | iha yaḥ sahadharmo vai pretyāyaṁ vihitaḥ kva nu ||
ยุธิษฐิระกล่าวว่า “ความสงสัยอันใหญ่ยิ่งเกิดขึ้นในใจเรา และคำสอนนี้ดูขัดแย้งกันเอง ‘สหธรรม’ ที่บัญญัติไว้ในโลกนี้—เมื่อถึงภาวะหลังความตายแล้ว ย่อมบัญญัติไว้ ณ ที่ใดกัน?”
युधिछिर उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse foregrounds a dharmic problem: Yudhiṣṭhira tests whether a duty prescribed for life in this world can coherently be claimed to operate after death. It emphasizes careful scrutiny of injunctions and the need for consistency between worldly ethics and claims about post-mortem consequences.
Yudhiṣṭhira, in a dialogue on dharma in the Anuśāsana Parva, raises a serious doubt. He perceives a contradiction regarding ‘saha-dharma’—a duty performed in association with another (often understood in spousal/companionship contexts)—and asks where such a rule is established with respect to the afterlife.