Shloka 36
Śama-prāptiḥ — Gautamī–Lubdhaka–Pannaga–Mṛtyu–Kāla-saṃvāda
Restraint through the Analysis of Karma and Time
तस्यायं वचनाद्ू दष्टो न कोपेन न काम्यया । तस्य तत्किल्बिषं लुब्ध विद्यते यदि किल्बिषम्,उसके कहनेसे ही मैंने इस बालकको डँसा है, क्रोधसे और कामनासे नहीं। व्याध! यदि इसमें कुछ अपराध है तो वह मेरा नहीं, मृत्युका है
tasyāyaṃ vacanād daṣṭo na kopena na kāmyayā | tasya tat kilbiṣaṃ lubdha vidyate yadi kilbiṣam ||
“เพราะถ้อยคำของเขาเท่านั้นเราจึงกัดเด็กผู้นี้ มิใช่ด้วยโทสะ มิใช่ด้วยความใคร่ หากมีความผิดใดในเรื่องนี้ โอ้พรานเอ๋ย มิใช่ของเรา—ความผิดนั้นย่อมเป็นของมฤตยู (ชะตา)”
सर्प उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse raises the ethical problem of agency and culpability: the serpent claims it acted only as an instrument responding to another’s word, denying personal motives like anger or desire, and shifting moral responsibility to Death/fate. It invites reflection on whether being an ‘instrument’ removes blame, or whether action still carries accountability.
In a dialogue, the serpent addresses a hunter and explains why it bit a boy. It insists the act was not driven by personal emotion or craving, and argues that if any wrongdoing is involved, it should be attributed to Death (the destined end) rather than to the serpent itself.