Ekādaśī-Vrata Nirṇaya: Avoiding Daśamī-Viddha and Establishing Trimīśrā
द्वादश्येकादशी यत्र तत्र सन्निहितो हरिः / दशम्येकादशी यत्र तत्र सन्निहितो ऽसुरः / बहुवाक्यविरोधेन सन्देहो जायते यदा
dvādaśyekādaśī yatra tatra sannihito hariḥ / daśamyekādaśī yatra tatra sannihito 'suraḥ / bahuvākyavirodhena sandeho jāyate yadā
ที่ใดเอกาทศีต่อเนื่องถึงทวาทศี ที่นั่นพระหริสถิตอยู่; แต่ที่ใดเอกาทศีต่อเนื่องถึงทศมี ที่นั่นอสูรสถิตอยู่ เมื่อถ้อยคำมากมายขัดแย้งกัน ความสงสัยย่อมเกิดขึ้น
Lord Vishnu (speaking to Garuda/Vinata-putra in the Garuda Purana dialogue frame)
Concept: Kāla-śuddhi governs spiritual efficacy: Ekādaśī aligned with Dvādaśī is divinely charged; if viddhā by Daśamī it is tainted. Conflicting authorities produce saṃdeha, requiring nirṇaya.
Vedantic Theme: Discernment (viveka) applied to dharma; the same outward act differs by subtle conditions, reflecting guṇa/kāla conditioning of results.
Application: Prefer Ekādaśī that extends into Dvādaśī; avoid Daśamī-viddhā. When texts/calendars disagree, seek a consistent nirṇaya method (sunrise rule, local tradition, competent ācārya).
Primary Rasa: adbhuta
Secondary Rasa: bhayanaka
Type: tithi-boundary (temporal locus rather than spatial)
Related Themes: Garuda Purana 1.125.4-6 (resolution rules: accept Dvādaśī, pāraṇa on Trayodaśī; Trimiśrā)
This verse stresses that the spiritual fruit of Ekādaśī depends on correct tithi alignment: Ekādaśī associated with Dvādaśī is considered Viṣṇu-aligned, while overlap with Daśamī is treated as inauspicious.
It explicitly notes that when multiple scriptural or traditional statements conflict, doubt naturally arises—implying the need for careful tithi determination and consistent authoritative guidance.
Follow a reliable pañcāṅga (Hindu calendar) and a consistent tradition/teacher for Ekādaśī determination, ensuring the fast aligns properly with the Ekādaśī–Dvādaśī window rather than a Daśamī overlap.