HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 17Shloka 19
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 19

Shraddhatraya Vibhaga YogaShraddhatraya Vibhaga Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 19 illustration

मूढग्राहेणात्मनो यत्पीडया क्रियते तपः । परस्योत्सादनार्थं वा तत्तामसमुदाहृतम् ॥ १७.१९ ॥

mūḍha-grāheṇātmano yat pīḍayā kriyate tapaḥ | parasyotsādanārthaṁ vā tat tāmasam udāhṛtam || 17.19 ||

ตบะที่ปฏิบัติด้วยความดื้อดึงอันเขลา โดยทรมานตนเอง หรือเพื่อมุ่งทำร้ายผู้อื่นนั้น ประกาศว่าเป็น “ตา มส”

Austerity practiced with foolish obstinacy by tormenting oneself, or for the purpose of harming another, is declared tāmasa.

Tapas performed through deluded fixation, involving self-affliction, or undertaken with the aim of undermining others, is called tāmasa.

Interpretation turns on mūḍha-grāha (“deluded grasp/obstinate fixation”) and utsādana (often “ruin,” here rendered more neutrally as “undermining”). Academic translations tend to stress irrational compulsion and socially destructive intent rather than physical extremity.

मूढग्राहेणby foolish obstinacy (by a deluded grasp)
मूढग्राहेण:
Karana
Rootमूढग्राह
आत्मनःof oneself
आत्मनः:
Rootआत्मन्
यत्which
यत्:
Rootयद्
पीडयाby torment; by affliction
पीडया:
Karana
Rootपीडा
क्रियतेis done; is performed
क्रियते:
Root√कृ
तपःausterity; penance
तपः:
Karta
Rootतपस्
परस्यof another; of others
परस्य:
Rootपर
उत्सादनार्थम्for the purpose of harming/destroying (bringing down)
उत्सादनार्थम्:
Karma
Rootउत्सादनार्थ
वाor
वा:
Rootवा
तत्that
तत्:
Rootतद्
तामसम्tamasic; of the quality of darkness/inertia
तामसम्:
Rootतामस
उदाहृतम्is said; is declared
उदाहृतम्:
Rootउद्-आ-√हृ
Krishna
TamasMoha (delusion)Ethics of intention
Critique of destructive asceticismDelusion and compulsionMisuse of discipline

FAQs

The verse can be read as warning against compulsive or punitive self-discipline and against practices motivated by resentment toward others.

Tāmasa tapas is portrayed as spiritually counterproductive because it intensifies ignorance (tamas) and egoic fixation rather than producing clarity or compassion.

It completes the guṇa-based typology of tapas by identifying the lowest mode as delusion-driven and ethically harmful in intent.

It supports distinguishing constructive discipline from coercive or harmful practices, emphasizing wellbeing, clarity, and non-malicious intent as criteria.