HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 3Shloka 4
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 4

Karma YogaKarma Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 4 illustration

न कर्मणामनारम्भान्नैष्कर्म्यं पुरुषोऽश्नुते । न च संन्यसनादेव सिद्धिं समधिगच्छति ॥ ३.४ ॥

na karmaṇām anārambhān naiṣkarmyaṃ puruṣo'śnute | na ca saṃnyasanād eva siddhiṃ samadhigacchati || 3.4 ||

มนุษย์ย่อมไม่บรรลุความไร้กรรม (นৈษ्कर्मยะ) ด้วยการไม่เริ่มทำกรรม; และย่อมไม่บรรลุความสำเร็จสมบูรณ์ด้วยการสละเพียงอย่างเดียว

A person does not attain actionlessness (freedom from karma) by not undertaking actions; nor does one attain perfection merely by renunciation.

Not by refraining from initiating actions does a person reach ‘non-action’ (naiṣkarmya); nor, merely by renunciation, does one attain accomplishment (siddhi).

Key interpretive issue: ‘naiṣkarmya’ is often read not as literal inactivity but as freedom from binding action (karma-bandha). ‘Saṃnyāsa’ here can mean external abandonment; commentators frequently contrast it with inner renunciation of attachment.

not
:
Root
कर्मणाम्of actions
कर्मणाम्:
Rootकर्मन्
अनारम्भात्from non-commencement (i.e., by not beginning)
अनारम्भात्:
Apadana
Rootअनारम्भ
नैष्कर्म्यम्actionlessness; freedom from (binding) action
नैष्कर्म्यम्:
Karma
Rootनैष्कर्म्य
पुरुषःa person
पुरुषः:
Karta
Rootपुरुष
अश्नुतेattains
अश्नुते:
Root√अश् (अश्नुते)
nor / not
:
Root
and
:
Root
संन्यसनात्from renunciation (of action)
संन्यसनात्:
Apadana
Rootसंन्यसन
एवalone; merely
एव:
Rootएव
सिद्धिम्perfection; accomplishment
सिद्धिम्:
Karma
Rootसिद्धि
समधिगच्छतिattains fully; reaches
समधिगच्छति:
Rootसम्+अधि+√गम्
KrishnaArjuna
KarmaNaiṣkarmyaSaṃnyāsaSiddhiAttachment (Saṅga)
Critique of mere inactivityInner vs outer renunciationNon-binding action

FAQs

Avoidance of duties can function as a defense mechanism (escape from anxiety or responsibility). The verse suggests that genuine freedom is not achieved by suppression or withdrawal alone, but by transforming one’s relation to action.

‘Non-action’ is framed as a state where actions do not generate binding residues, implying a shift in agency and identification rather than physical stillness.

It directly addresses Arjuna’s temptation to step back from his obligations. Krishna argues that mere non-participation does not itself yield spiritual completion.

In contemporary life, quitting tasks is not automatically liberating; the verse recommends acting with clarity and reduced attachment—e.g., doing one’s work conscientiously without over-identifying with success or failure.