HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 3Shloka 33
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 33

Karma YogaKarma Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 33 illustration

सदृशं चेष्टते स्वस्याः प्रकृतेर्ज्ञानवानपि । प्रकृतिं यान्ति भूतानि निग्रहः किं करिष्यति ॥ ३.३३ ॥

sadṛśaṁ ceṣṭate svasyāḥ prakṛter jñānavān api | prakṛtiṁ yānti bhūtāni nigrahaḥ kiṁ kariṣyati || 3.33 ||

แม้ผู้มีญาณก็ยังประพฤติตามสภาวะ–ธรรมชาติของตนเอง; สรรพสัตว์ทั้งหลายย่อมดำเนินไปตามธรรมชาติ แล้วการข่มใจ/การยับยั้งเพียงอย่างเดียวจะทำอะไรได้เล่า?

Even a person of knowledge acts according to one’s own nature; beings follow nature. What will restraint (alone) accomplish?

Even the knowing person behaves in conformity with their own prakṛti; beings proceed according to prakṛti—what can repression accomplish?

Traditional renderings often warn against mere suppression of impulses; academic readings stress the descriptive claim about conditioned behavior (prakṛti) and the limits of external restraint without inner transformation.

सदृशम्similar (thing/way)
सदृशम्:
Karma
Rootसदृश
and
:
Root
चेष्टतेacts; makes effort; behaves
चेष्टते:
Root√चेष्ट्
स्वस्याःof one’s own
स्वस्याः:
Rootस्व
प्रकृतेःof (one’s) nature
प्रकृतेः:
Rootप्रकृति
ज्ञानवान्the knowledgeable person; one possessing knowledge
ज्ञानवान्:
Karta
Rootज्ञानवत्
अपिeven; although
अपि:
Rootअपि
प्रकृतिम्nature
प्रकृतिम्:
Karma
Rootप्रकृति
यान्तिgo; follow; proceed (towards)
यान्ति:
Root√या
भूतानिbeings; creatures
भूतानि:
Karta
Rootभूत
निग्रहःrestraint; suppression; control
निग्रहः:
Karta
Rootनिग्रह
किम्what?
किम्:
Karma
Rootकिम्
करिष्यतिwill do; will accomplish
करिष्यति:
Root√कृ
Krishna
PrakṛtiGuṇasSaṁskāraNigraha
Conditioned actionLimits of repressionDiscipline aligned with nature

FAQs

The verse notes that habits and dispositions shape behavior even in reflective people; lasting change typically requires working with tendencies rather than only suppressing them.

It presumes a prakṛti-based model of embodiment: the guṇas and prior impressions condition the embodied agent’s activity, even when knowledge is present.

It supports the chapter’s argument for disciplined action (karma-yoga) by explaining why mere withdrawal or forceful repression may fail.

Choose practices and routines that redirect tendencies (e.g., structured duties, mindful habits) rather than relying only on willpower and denial.