HomeVamana PuranaAdh. 61Shloka 19
Next Verse

Vamana Purana — Sin-Destroying Hymn (Part 2), Shloka 19

The Second Sin-Destroying Hymn (Pāpaśamana Stava) and Syncretic Praise of Hari-Hara

श्रीकण्ठं वासुदेवं नीलकण्ठं सदण्डिनम् नमस्ये सर्वमनघं गौरीशं नकुलीस्वरम्

śrīkaṇṭhaṃ vāsudevaṃ nīlakaṇṭhaṃ sadaṇḍinam namasye sarvamanaghaṃ gaurīśaṃ nakulīsvaram

{"bhagavata_parallel": "Bhāgavata Purāṇa 8.18–23 (Upendra/Vāmana as Aditi’s son; the epithet Upendra is central though here used as a kṣetra-name).", "vishnu_purana_parallel": "Viṣṇu Purāṇa (Upendra/Vāmana naming in avatāra lists; general parallel).", "ramayana_connection": "Siṃhala-dvīpa appears in later geographic imagination connected to Laṅkā/Sri Lanka (broad cultural link).", "mahabharata_echo": null, "other_puranas": ["Skanda Purana (kṣetra lists including dvīpas, general parallel)", "Brahmanda Purana (dvīpa descriptions; general parallel)"], "vedic_reference": null}

:
:
:
:
Unspecified eulogist/narrator within the chapter’s stuti-context (addressing the Supreme through Śaiva-Vaiṣṇava nomenclature)
ShivaVishnuParvati
Shaiva-Vaishnava unity (Vāsudeva alongside Śiva epithets)Pāśupata/ascetic Śaivism (Nakulīśvara; staff-bearing imagery)Purity and faultlessness of the divine (anagha)Mythic allusion (Nīlakaṇṭha: poison-bearing episode)

{ "primaryRasa": "adbhuta", "secondaryRasa": "shanta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }

FAQs

The verse exemplifies Purāṇic inclusivism: the sacred narrative space (especially in a māhātmya) is sanctified by acknowledging both Vaiṣṇava and Śaiva manifestations, implying a shared supreme divinity accessible through multiple names.

Nakulīśvara (often aligned with Lākulīśa/Nakulīśa) denotes a revered Śaiva authority associated with the Pāśupata tradition. In stuti, it functions as a powerful Śiva-epithet highlighting ascetic lineage and doctrinal authority.

It can indicate Śiva’s ascetic/disciplinary aspect (a renunciant bearing a staff) and, more broadly, the Lord as the upholder of order (daṇḍa as chastisement/justice). The verse does not specify a particular icon, so both resonances are plausible.