The Second Sin-Destroying Hymn (Pāpaśamana Stava) and Syncretic Praise of Hari-Hara
श्रीकण्ठं वासुदेवं नीलकण्ठं सदण्डिनम् नमस्ये सर्वमनघं गौरीशं नकुलीस्वरम्
śrīkaṇṭhaṃ vāsudevaṃ nīlakaṇṭhaṃ sadaṇḍinam namasye sarvamanaghaṃ gaurīśaṃ nakulīsvaram
{"bhagavata_parallel": "Bhāgavata Purāṇa 8.18–23 (Upendra/Vāmana as Aditi’s son; the epithet Upendra is central though here used as a kṣetra-name).", "vishnu_purana_parallel": "Viṣṇu Purāṇa (Upendra/Vāmana naming in avatāra lists; general parallel).", "ramayana_connection": "Siṃhala-dvīpa appears in later geographic imagination connected to Laṅkā/Sri Lanka (broad cultural link).", "mahabharata_echo": null, "other_puranas": ["Skanda Purana (kṣetra lists including dvīpas, general parallel)", "Brahmanda Purana (dvīpa descriptions; general parallel)"], "vedic_reference": null}
{ "primaryRasa": "adbhuta", "secondaryRasa": "shanta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
The verse exemplifies Purāṇic inclusivism: the sacred narrative space (especially in a māhātmya) is sanctified by acknowledging both Vaiṣṇava and Śaiva manifestations, implying a shared supreme divinity accessible through multiple names.
Nakulīśvara (often aligned with Lākulīśa/Nakulīśa) denotes a revered Śaiva authority associated with the Pāśupata tradition. In stuti, it functions as a powerful Śiva-epithet highlighting ascetic lineage and doctrinal authority.
It can indicate Śiva’s ascetic/disciplinary aspect (a renunciant bearing a staff) and, more broadly, the Lord as the upholder of order (daṇḍa as chastisement/justice). The verse does not specify a particular icon, so both resonances are plausible.