Shloka 11
Ātma-saṃyama-dharma: One-pointedness of Mind and Senses (शुक–व्यास संवादः)
इत्येतच्छोतुमिच्छामि प्रमाणं तूभयं कथम् । कर्मणामविरोधेन कथं मोक्ष: प्रवर्तते,शुकदेवने पूछा--पिताजी! “कर्म करो” और “कर्म छोड़ो'--ये जो वेदके दो तरहके वचन हैं, लोकदृष्टिसे विचार करनेपर परस्पर विरुद्ध जान पड़ते हैं। ये प्रामाणिक हैं या अप्रामाणिक? यदि प्रामाणिक हैं तो परस्पर विरोध रहते हुए इन्हें शास्त्रवचन कैसे माना जा सकता है तथा दोनों ही प्रामाणिक कैसे हो सकते हैं? यह सब मैं सुनना चाहता हूँ; साथ ही यह भी बताइये कि कर्मोका विरोध किये बिना मोक्षकी प्राप्ति किस तरह हो सकती है?
ity etac chrotum icchāmi pramāṇaṁ tūbhayaṁ katham | karmaṇām avirodhena kathaṁ mokṣaḥ pravartate ||
శుకుడు పలికెను—ఇదంతా నేను వినాలని కోరుతున్నాను: ఈ రెండూ ఎలా ప్రమాణమవుతాయి? అలాగే కర్మలతో విరోధం లేకుండానే మోక్షం ఎలా సిద్ధిస్తుంది? దయచేసి వివరించండి.
शुक उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse frames a central śāstric problem: Vedic teachings sometimes prescribe action (karma, duties/rites) and elsewhere praise renunciation. Śuka asks how both can be valid authorities and how liberation can arise without contradicting the domain of duty—inviting a reconciliation such as differing contexts/eligibilities, stages of life, or inner renunciation while outwardly performing duty.
Śuka, in dialogue with his father (traditionally Vyāsa), requests clarification on an apparent contradiction in scripture: ‘perform action’ versus ‘abandon action.’ He seeks an interpretive principle that preserves the authority of both and a practical account of how mokṣa is attained without rejecting prescribed conduct.