HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 18Shloka 12
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Moksha Sannyasa Yoga, Shloka 12

Moksha Sannyasa Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 12 illustration

अनिष्टमिष्टं मिश्रं च त्रिविधं कर्मणः फलम् । भवत्यत्यागिनां प्रेत्य न तु संन्यासिनां क्वचित् ॥ १८.१२ ॥

aniṣṭam iṣṭaṃ miśraṃ ca tri-vidhaṃ karmaṇaḥ phalam | bhavaty atyāgināṃ pretya na tu saṃnyāsināṃ kvacit || 18.12 ||

కర్మఫలం అనిష్టం, ఇష్టము, మిశ్రమము—అని మూడు విధాలు; త్యాగం చేయని వారికి మరణానంతరం అది కలుగుతుంది; కానీ సన్న్యాసులకు ఎప్పుడూ కాదు.

कर्म का फल अनिष्ट, इष्ट और मिश्र—इस प्रकार तीन प्रकार का होता है; यह फल त्याग न करने वालों को मरने के बाद मिलता है, परंतु संन्यासियों को कभी नहीं।

The fruit of action is threefold—undesired, desired, and mixed; it accrues after death for those who do not relinquish, but not for renouncers at any time.

Traditional interpretations may align ‘saṃnyāsin’ here with one who has renounced fruits/ego (not necessarily a formal monastic). Academic readings note the after-death (‘pretya’) karmic accounting typical of dharma discourse.

अनिष्टम्undesirable (unpleasant)
अनिष्टम्:
Rootअनिष्ट
इष्टम्desirable (pleasant)
इष्टम्:
Rootइष्ट
मिश्रम्mixed (both pleasant and unpleasant)
मिश्रम्:
Rootमिश्र
and
:
Root
त्रिविधम्threefold
त्रिविधम्:
Rootत्रिविध
कर्मणःof action (of karma)
कर्मणः:
Rootकर्मन्
फलम्fruit; result
फलम्:
Rootफल
भवतिarises; becomes; accrues
भवति:
Root√भू
अत्यागिनाम्of the non-renouncers (those who do not give up)
अत्यागिनाम्:
Rootअत्यागिन्
प्रेत्यafter death; having departed
प्रेत्य:
Root√इ (प्र-इ)
not
:
Root
तुbut
तु:
Rootतु
संन्यासिनाम्of the renouncers (sannyāsins)
संन्यासिनाम्:
Rootसंन्यासिन्
क्वचित्ever; anywhere; at any time
क्वचित्:
Rootक्वचित्
KrishnaArjuna
Karma-phalaSaṃnyāsa/tyāgaMoral causalityRebirth/after-death fruition (pretya)
Consequences of attachmentKarmic fruitionRenunciation and non-accrual

FAQs

Attachment tends to keep the mind invested in reward/punishment narratives; the verse suggests that relinquishment reduces the sense of being personally ‘owed’ outcomes.

Within karmic theory, clinging to fruits sustains the chain of moral causality across time; renunciation interrupts appropriation of results and thus limits further binding consequences.

It extends 18.11 by describing what happens to those who do not practice fruit-renunciation: they remain subject to the threefold spectrum of karmic results.

Interpreted secularly, outcomes of actions can be pleasant, unpleasant, or mixed; reducing possessiveness about results helps one stay balanced amid all three.