HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 3Shloka 23
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 23

Karma YogaKarma Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 23 illustration

यदि ह्यहं न वर्तेयं जातु कर्मण्यतन्द्रितः । मम वर्त्मानुवर्तन्ते मनुष्याः पार्थ सर्वशः ॥ ३.२३ ॥

yadi hy ahaṁ na varteyaṁ jātu karmaṇy atandritaḥ | mama vartmānuvartante manuṣyāḥ pārtha sarvaśaḥ || 3.23 ||

ఎందుకంటే, నేను ఎప్పుడైనా అలసట లేకుండా (అతంద్రితుడై) కర్మలో ప్రవృత్తి చెందకపోతే, ఓ పార్థా, మనుష్యులు అన్ని విధాలా నా మార్గాన్నే అనుసరిస్తారు.

For, if I did not ever engage tirelessly in action, O Pārtha, people would in every way follow my path.

If I were never to remain engaged in action, without negligence, O Pārtha, human beings would follow my course in every respect.

Both readings emphasize exemplary leadership: the “traditional” phrasing stresses divine exemplariness; the more literal rendering highlights social imitation (others model themselves on the agent’s conduct). No major variant is implied by the given text.

यदिif
यदि:
Rootयदि
हिindeed, for
हि:
Rootहि
अहम्I
अहम्:
Karta
Rootअस्मद्
not
:
Root
वर्तेयम्should engage / should act / should proceed
वर्तेयम्:
Root√वृत् (वर्तते)
जातुever, at any time
जातु:
Rootजातु
कर्मणिin action, in work
कर्मणि:
Adhikarana
Rootकर्मन्
अतन्द्रितःunwearied, vigilant, not negligent
अतन्द्रितः:
Rootअतन्द्रित
ममof me, my
मम:
Rootअस्मद्
वर्त्मpath, course (of conduct)
वर्त्म:
Karma
Rootवर्त्मन्
अनुवर्तन्तेfollow, conform to
अनुवर्तन्ते:
Root√वृत् (अनुवर्तते)
मनुष्याःmen, human beings
मनुष्याः:
Karta
Rootमनुष्य
पार्थO son of Pritha (Arjuna)
पार्थ:
Rootपार्थ
सर्वशःin every way, entirely, on all sides
सर्वशः:
Rootसर्वशस्
Krishna
KarmaDharmaLokasaṅgraha
Exemplary conductSocial orderDuty without negligence

FAQs

The verse frames motivation as partly relational: one’s sustained effort can stabilize others’ confidence and norms, reducing collective hesitation or apathy.

It supports the idea that liberated or authoritative agents may still act, not from personal lack, but to sustain the pedagogical and ethical order.

In the argument for karma-yoga, Krishna explains why action remains appropriate even for the highest exemplar: society imitates prominent figures.

In institutions, visible adherence to responsibilities by leaders can prevent disengagement and normalize conscientious work.