Shukra’s Curse on King Danda and Prahlada’s Counsel to Andhaka on Dharma
बाणाः कार्तस्वरो हस्ती सूर्यशत्रुर्महोदरः अयःशुङ्कुः शिबिः शाल्वो वृषपर्वा विरोचनः
bāṇāḥ kārtasvaro hastī sūryaśatrurmahodaraḥ ayaḥśuṅkuḥ śibiḥ śālvo vṛṣaparvā virocanaḥ
{"has_teaching": true, "teaching_type": "dharma", "core_concept": "daiva-sākṣitva (divine witnessing) and cosmic order upheld through deva participation", "teaching_summary": "The presence of the devas as witnesses frames the conflict as more than personal violence: it is a dharmic rebalancing observed and sanctioned at the cosmic level.", "vedantic_theme": "Īśvara as the regulator of ṛta/dharma through cosmic governance; events unfold under higher supervision.", "practical_application": "Act with accountability as though under sacred witness; align power and action with dharma rather than impulse."}
{ "primaryRasa": "vira", "secondaryRasa": "raudra", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
Yes, the syntax continues the mustering motif: a coalition of daitya/asura champions assembling for a campaign against Śiva (Tryambaka). Purāṇic narration often compresses command structure and focuses on the prestige of named combatants.
Name-reuse across traditions is common. A Purāṇic roster may preserve an older or alternate identification, or the name may refer to a different figure sharing the same appellation. Without additional qualifiers (lineage, epithet, deeds), the verse cannot securely equate this Śibi with the celebrated donor-king of other narratives.
They anchor the episode in well-known daitya genealogies: Virocana (often linked to Prahlāda’s line) and Vṛṣaparvan (known from other mythic cycles) signal that the conflict is not local or minor but involves major asura houses.