HomeVamana PuranaAdh. 60Shloka 4
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Vamana Purana — Sin-Destroying Hymn (Part 1), Shloka 4

The Second Sin-Destroying Hymn (Pāpaśamana Stava) and the Syncretic Praise of Hari-Hara

यज्ञध्वज नमस्तुभ्यं धर्मध्वज नमो ऽस्तु ते तालध्वज नमस्ते ऽस्तु नमस्ते गरुहध्वज

yajñadhvaja namastubhyaṃ dharmadhvaja namo 'stu te tāladhvaja namaste 'stu namaste garuhadhvaja

{"has_teaching": true, "teaching_type": "bhakti", "core_concept": "Viṣṇu-prasāda as protective power; approaching the Lord establishes spiritual and even physical security for sādhakas.", "teaching_summary": "The verse teaches that proximity to Viṣṇu (upāsanā/āśraya) transforms a place into a sanctuary beyond the reach of hostile forces; grace (prasāda) is the decisive factor.", "vedantic_theme": "Īśvara-anugraha (divine grace) as the enabling cause for safety and progress; bhakti as śaraṇāgati.", "practical_application": "Cultivate regular approach to Viṣṇu through darśana, nāma-japa, and temple/holy-place association; rely on prasāda rather than fear-driven reactions."}

Unspecified in the provided excerpt; direct address (stuti) to Viṣṇu.
VishnuGaruḍa (as emblem/vāhana, implied)
Stuti (praise of Vishnu)Yajña theology (Vishnu as sacrifice)Dharma as cosmic orderVaiṣṇava iconography (Garuḍa emblem)

{ "primaryRasa": "vira", "secondaryRasa": "shanta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }

FAQs

Purāṇas frequently equate Viṣṇu with yajña: He is the recipient, inner essence, and sustaining power of sacrificial order. Calling Him “Yajñadhvaja” makes sacrifice itself His defining ‘standard,’ aligning ritual order with divine sovereignty.

It is a hallmark Vaiṣṇava epithet: Viṣṇu is ‘marked by Garuḍa’ on His banner, signaling His identity as the Lord who rides Garuḍa and whose presence dispels obstacles and affirms protection. It also distinguishes Him iconographically from other deities in multi-deity narratives.

Not always. ‘Palm-bannered’ appears across Sanskrit traditions as a banner-epithet; in this stuti it functions as one among several dhvaja-compounds emphasizing the Lord’s emblematic supremacy. Without additional surrounding verses specifying a particular mythic episode, it is best treated as a poetic honorific rather than a precise narrative identifier.