Shloka 34
वाली–रामसंवादः
Rama’s Justification to Vali on Rājadharma
आर्येण मम मान्धात्रा व्यसनं घोरमीप्सितम्।श्रमणेन कृते पापे यथा पापं कृतं त्वया।।
āryeṇa mama māndhātrā vyasanaṃ ghoram īpsitam | śramaṇena kṛte pāpe yathā pāpaṃ kṛtaṃ tvayā ||
என் ஆரிய குலத்தில் மாந்தாதா மன்னன் ஒருமுறை, ஒரு சிரமணன் பாவம் செய்தபோது, அவனுக்கு கடுமையான தண்டனையை விதித்தான்—நீ செய்த பாவத்தைப் போலவே.
'In the past a similar sin was perpetrated by Sramana, a revered soul (mendicant) and Mandhata, a noble king of my race inflicted terrible punishment on him.
FAQs
Dharma is supported by precedent (itihāsa): even respected persons, when they transgress, are subject to rightful punishment.
Rama cites an illustrative historical example to show that punishment for wrongdoing has long-standing sanction.
Impartial justice—status does not exempt one from dharma’s consequences.