Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 60

Śuka’s Guṇa-Transcendence and Vyāsa’s Consolation (शुकगति-वर्णनम्)

वर्तसे मोक्षधर्मेण त्वं गार्हस्थ्येड5हमाश्रमे । अयं चापि सुकष्टस्ते द्वितीयो55श्रमसंकर:

vartase mokṣa-dharmeṇa tvaṃ gārhasthye ’ham āśrame | ayaṃ cāpi su-kaṣṭas te dvitīyo ’śrama-saṅkaraḥ ||

நீ மோட்சதர்மத்தின் வழியில் நடக்கிறாய்; நான் கிருஹஸ்த ஆச்ரமத்தில் இருக்கிறேன். இதுவும் உனக்குப் பெருங்கடினம்—இரண்டாம் ‘ஆச்ரமசங்கர’ம்.

वर्तसेyou live/abide, you conduct yourself
वर्तसे:
Karta
TypeVerb
Rootवृत् (वर्तते)
Formलट् (वर्तमान), आत्मनेपद, मध्यम, एकवचन
मोक्षधर्मेणby/according to the dharma of liberation
मोक्षधर्मेण:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootमोक्षधर्म
Formपुंलिङ्ग, तृतीया, एकवचन
त्वम्you
त्वम्:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootयुष्मद्
Form—, प्रथमा, एकवचन
गार्हस्थ्येin the householder-state
गार्हस्थ्ये:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootगार्हस्थ्य
Formनपुंसकलिङ्ग, सप्तमी, एकवचन
अहम्I
अहम्:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootअस्मद्
Form—, प्रथमा, एकवचन
आश्रमेin the āśrama (stage of life)
आश्रमे:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootआश्रम
Formपुंलिङ्ग, सप्तमी, एकवचन
अयम्this
अयम्:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootइदम्
Formपुंलिङ्ग, प्रथमा, एकवचन
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
अपिalso/even
अपि:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootअपि
सुकष्टःvery difficult
सुकष्टः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootसुकष्ट
Formपुंलिङ्ग, प्रथमा, एकवचन
तेfor you/to you
ते:
Sampradana
TypePronoun
Rootयुष्मद्
Form—, चतुर्थी, एकवचन
द्वितीयःsecond
द्वितीयः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootद्वितीय
Formपुंलिङ्ग, प्रथमा, एकवचन
आश्रमसंकरःmixing/confusion of āśramas (stages of life)
आश्रमसंकरः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootआश्रमसंकर
Formपुंलिङ्ग, प्रथमा, एकवचन

जनक उवाच

J
Janaka
Ā
āśrama (life-stage system)
G
gārhasthya (householder stage)
M
mokṣa-dharma (path/dharma of liberation)

Educational Q&A

Liberation-oriented discipline (mokṣa-dharma) can be pursued even within the householder stage, but it is exceptionally demanding because it risks an ‘āśrama-saṅkara’—a problematic blending of duties and disciplines meant for different life-stages.

King Janaka addresses the interlocutor, acknowledging their commitment to mokṣa-dharma while living as a householder, and points out the difficulty of maintaining clarity and consistency when householder obligations and renunciant ideals become intermingled.