Shukra’s Saṃjīvanī, Shiva’s Containment of the Asuras, and Indra’s Recovery of Power
इत्येवमुक्ते गवांस्त्यक्त्वा स्यन्दनमुत्तमम् क्षमातलं निपपातैव परिभ्रष्टस्रगम्बरः
ityevamukte gavāṃstyaktvā syandanamuttamam kṣamātalaṃ nipapātaiva paribhraṣṭasragambaraḥ
इत्येवम् उक्ते सVamana Purana,44,78,VamP 44.78,sahasrākṣo 'pi saṃyātu parvataṃ malayaṃ śubham tatra svakāryaṃ kṛtvaiva paścād yātu triviṣṭapam,सहस्राक्षो ऽपि संयातु पर्वतं मलयं शुभम् तत्र स्वकार्यं कृत्वैव पश्चाद् यातु त्रिविष्टपम्,Andhaka Vadha,Narrative (Indra’s itinerary; sacred mountain reference),Adhyaya 44 (Andhaka-vadha-prasaṅga; Deva-gaṇa-visarjana),78,sahasrākṣo 'pi saṃyātu parvataṃ malayaṃ śubham |
{ "primaryRasa": "karuna", "secondaryRasa": "bhayanaka", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
In Purāṇic poetics, disordered ornaments symbolize diminished tejas (splendor) and shaken sovereignty. The imagery marks a transition from divine composure to defeat and vulnerability.
Not in these verses. Many texts name Indra’s chariot (often associated with divine craftsmanship), but here it is described generically as ‘uttama syandana,’ emphasizing quality rather than a proper name.
No. It simply means the ground/earth’s surface; it is not a geographic toponym and does not function as a tīrtha reference.