Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 4

Vyavahāra-Śuddhi and Rājadharma: Clean Administration, Counsel, and Proportional Punishment

Chapter 86

ये चैव पूर्व कथिता गुणास्ते पुरुष प्रति । नैकस्मिन्‌ पुरुषे होते विद्यन्त इति मे मति:,मेरी तो ऐसी मान्यता है कि पहले आपने पुरुषके लिये जिन गुणोंका वर्णन किया है, वे सब किसी एक पुरुषमें नहीं मिल सकते

ye caiva pūrva-kathitā guṇās te puruṣa prati | naikasmin puruṣe hote vidyanta iti me matiḥ ||

ये चैव पूर्वं कथिता गुणास्ते पुरुषं प्रति। नैकस्मिन् पुरुषे सर्वे विद्यन्त इति मे मतिः॥

येwhich (those)
ये:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootयद्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
एवindeed/just
एव:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootएव
पूर्वम्formerly/earlier
पूर्वम्:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootपूर्व
कथिताःsaid/declared
कथिताः:
TypeAdjective
Rootकथित
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
गुणाःqualities
गुणाः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootगुण
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
तेthose
ते:
TypePronoun
Rootतद्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
पुरुषम्a man/person
पुरुषम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootपुरुष
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular
प्रतिtowards/with regard to
प्रति:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootप्रति
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
एकस्मिन्in one (single)
एकस्मिन्:
Adhikarana
TypeAdjective
Rootएक
FormMasculine/Neuter, Locative, Singular
पुरुषेin a person
पुरुषे:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootपुरुष
FormMasculine, Locative, Singular
होतेare/occur
होते:
TypeVerb
Rootभू
FormPresent, 3rd, Plural, Atmanepada
विद्यन्तेare found/exist
विद्यन्ते:
TypeVerb
Rootविद्
FormPresent, 3rd, Plural, Atmanepada
इतिthus/that
इति:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootइति
मेmy/of me
मे:
TypePronoun
Rootअस्मद्
FormGenitive, Singular
मतिःopinion/view
मतिः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootमति
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular

युधिछिर उवाच

Y
Yudhiṣṭhira

Educational Q&A

Yudhiṣṭhira highlights the practical difficulty of embodying every ideal virtue in a single individual, urging a realistic and discerning approach to ethical evaluation rather than expecting flawless perfection.

In the Śānti Parva’s reflective dialogue on dharma and ideal conduct, Yudhiṣṭhira responds to an earlier description of exemplary qualities by expressing doubt that all such virtues can coexist in one person.