Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 4

Adhyāya 39: Śiśupāla’s Censure and Bhīma’s Contained Wrath (शिशुपाल-निन्दा तथा भीमक्रोध-निग्रहः)

मतिमन्तश्न ये केचिदाचार्य पितरं गुरुम्‌,स एव हि मया वध्यो भविष्यति न संशय: । “राजाओ! केशी दैत्यका वध करनेवाले अनन्त-पराक्रमी भगवान्‌ श्रीकृष्णकी मेरे द्वारा जो पूजा की गयी है, उसे आपलोगोंमेंसे जो सहन न कर सकें, उन सब बलवानोंके मस्तकपर मैंने यह पैर रख दिया। मैंने खूब सोच-समझकर यह बात कही है। जो इसका उत्तर देना चाहे, वह सामने आ जाय। मेरे द्वारा वह वधके योग्य होगा; इसमें संशय नहीं है

matimantaś ca ye kecid ācāryaṃ pitaraṃ gurum | sa eva hi mayā vadhyo bhaviṣyati na saṃśayaḥ ||

मतिमन्तोऽपि ये केचिदाचार्यं पितरं गुरुम् । न सहन्ते मया कृष्णं पूज्यमानं नृपाः, स एव हि मया वध्यो भविष्यति न संशयः ॥

मतिमन्तःintelligent, thoughtful (persons)
मतिमन्तः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootमतिमन्त्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
येwho (those who)
ये:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootयद्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
केचित्some (certain ones)
केचित्:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootकिम् + चित्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
आचार्यO teacher
आचार्य:
TypeNoun
Rootआचार्य
FormMasculine, Vocative, Singular
पितरम्father
पितरम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootपितृ
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular
गुरुम्guru, preceptor
गुरुम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootगुरु
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular
सःhe, that person
सः:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootतद्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
एवindeed, certainly
एव:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootएव
हिfor, indeed
हि:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootहि
मयाby me
मया:
Karana
TypePronoun
Rootअस्मद्
FormInstrumental, Singular
वध्यःto be slain, fit to be killed
वध्यः:
TypeAdjective
Rootवध्य
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
भविष्यतिwill be / will become
भविष्यति:
TypeVerb
Rootभू
FormSimple Future (Luṭ), 3, Singular
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
संशयःdoubt
संशयः:
TypeNoun
Rootसंशय
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular

वैशम्पायन उवाच

V
Vaiśaṃpāyana
Ś
Śrī Kṛṣṇa
K
Keśin (Keśi)

Educational Q&A

The passage highlights how honor offered to a worthy figure (here, Kṛṣṇa) becomes a moral test for the assembly: those driven by envy or wounded pride cannot tolerate rightful reverence and thereby invite conflict. It warns that arrogance and intolerance toward others’ devotion or merit can rapidly turn a courtly setting into a stage for violence.

In the royal assembly context, a speaker (reported by Vaiśaṃpāyana) issues a provocative challenge: anyone who cannot bear the worship/honor shown to Kṛṣṇa should come forward, for such a person is declared worthy of being slain. The rhetoric of ‘placing a foot on their heads’ signals domination and deliberate insult, escalating tensions among powerful men present.