भीष्मपर्व — अध्याय ११०: पार्थभीमयोः प्रहारः तथा भीष्माभिमुखं संग्रामविस्तारः
Arjuna and Bhima’s pressure; escalation toward Bhishma
यस्याहमधिरुह्याडुकं बाल: किल गदाग्रज । तातेत्यवोचं पितरं पितु: पाण्डोर्महात्मन:,“गदाग्रज! कहते हैं, मैं बचपनमें अपने पिता महात्मा पाण्डुके भी पितृतुल्य भीष्मजीकी गोदमें चढ़कर जब उन्हें तात कहकर पुकारता था, उस समय उस बाल्यावस्थामें ही वे मुझसे इस प्रकार कहते थे--“भरतनन्दन! मैं तुम्हारा तात नहीं, तुम्हारे पिताका तात हूँ।' वे ही वृद्ध पितामह मेरे द्वारा मारनेयोग्य कैसे हो सकते हैं?
yasyāham adhiruhyāṅkaṃ bālaḥ kila gadāgraja | tātety avocaṃ pitaraṃ pituḥ pāṇḍor mahātmanaḥ ||
सञ्जय उवाच—गदाग्रज! श्रूयते यदहं बालः सन् तस्यैवाङ्कमारुह्य ‘तात’ इति तमवोचम्; स च मामेव बाल्येऽपि प्रत्यवदत्—‘भरतनन्दन! नाहं तव तातः, तव पितुस्तातोऽस्मि।’ स एव वृद्धः पितामहः कथं मया वध्यः स्यात्?
संजय उवाच
The verse foregrounds the dharmic tension between the duty of war and the duty of reverence toward elders: even when battle demands violence, one’s conscience recoils from harming a revered guardian who functioned as a father.
A speaker recalls childhood intimacy with the aged grandsire—climbing onto his lap and calling him ‘father’—and the grandsire’s correction that he is the father’s father. This memory is used to argue that such a venerable elder cannot be considered a proper target for killing.