Shukra’s Curse on King Danda and Andhaka’s Challenge to Shiva
इन्द्रद्युम्नस्य महिषी गदिता ब्रह्मणा स्वयम् मनोः पुत्रस्य वीरस्य सहस्रक्रतुयाजिनः
indradyumnasya mahiṣī gaditā brahmaṇā svayam manoḥ putrasya vīrasya sahasrakratuyājinaḥ
Её объявили царицей Индрадьюмны — героя, сына Ману, совершившего жертвоприношения тысячу раз, как это засвидетельствовал сам Брахма.
{ "primaryRasa": "vira", "secondaryRasa": "shanta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
These epithets establish dharmic legitimacy and extraordinary merit. In Purāṇic tīrtha narratives, a highly meritorious king’s crisis becomes a vehicle to teach about karma, vows, tīrtha-power, and the limits of ritual merit without right understanding or divine grace.
It supplies unimpeachable authority (pramāṇa) within the narrative world. By invoking Brahmā’s direct statement, the text removes ambiguity about identity and elevates the episode’s theological weight.
Yes, it deliberately resonates with Indra’s title, suggesting Indradyumna’s near-Indra-like ritual prowess. The echo heightens the contrast when such a figure still encounters distress—prompting reflection on deeper dharma beyond sheer ritual quantity.