The Second Sin-Destroying Hymn (Pāpaśamana Stava) and the Syncretic Praise of Hari-Hara
एकशृङ्ग नमस्तुभ्यं नमस्तुभ्यं वृषाकपे श्रीनिवास नमस्ते ऽस्तु नमस्ते भूतभावन
ekaśṛṅga namastubhyaṃ namastubhyaṃ vṛṣākape śrīnivāsa namaste 'stu namaste bhūtabhāvana
{"has_teaching": true, "teaching_type": "dharma", "core_concept": "satya-dharma as divine standard; the Lord as leader of cosmic order", "teaching_summary": "By praising Nārāyaṇa as Viṣvaksena and as bearer of steadfast and truthful banners, the verse frames divine governance as grounded in satya and unwavering dharma.", "vedantic_theme": "īśvara as niyantṛ (cosmic ruler) whose order is satya; devotion aligns the self with that order", "practical_application": "Hold to truthfulness and steadiness in vows; invoke the Lord as inner commander (viṣvaksena) when resisting adharma."}
{ "primaryRasa": "adbhuta", "secondaryRasa": "shanta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
Purāṇic stutis often stack epithets to invoke multiple theological facets at once—cosmic sovereignty (ekaśṛṅga), heroic potency (vṛṣākapi), auspicious presence with Lakṣmī (śrīnivāsa), and universal causality (bhūtabhāvana). This is a standard devotional-poetic technique that also functions as a compact theology.
In Purāṇic usage, “ekaśṛṅga” can signal singular supremacy (“the One with the single horn/peak”), and may echo older Vedic idioms where unusual physical markers symbolize unique power. In a stuti context it is best read as an honorific emphasizing unmatched lordship rather than a literal zoological description.
No. This śloka is purely doxological (praise) and contains no toponyms or hydrography. Any geographical framing would come from surrounding verses/chapters, not from this line itself.