Shloka 2
Arjuna’s Absence, Bhīma’s Kṣātra-Dharma Appeal, and Bṛhadaśva’s Arrival
Nala-Upākhyāna Begins
मन्युना हि समाविष्टा: पाण्डवास्ते महौजस: । दृष्टवा कृष्णां सभां नीतां धर्मपत्नीं यशस्विनीम्,महातेजस्वी वे पाण्डव अपनी धर्मपत्नी यशस्विनी कृष्णाको सभामें लायी गयी देखकर क्रोधसे भरे हुए हैं और महाराज! दुःशासन तथा कर्णकी वे कठोर बातें सुनकर पाण्डव आपलोगोंकी निन्दा करते हैं, ऐसा मुझे विश्वास है
manyunā hi samāviṣṭāḥ pāṇḍavās te mahaujasaḥ | dṛṣṭvā kṛṣṇāṃ sabhāṃ nītāṃ dharmapatnīṃ yaśasvinīm ||
Санджая сказал: Воистину могучие Пандавы охвачены гневом. Увидев, как Кришну — их прославленную законную супругу по дхарме — ведут в царское собрание, они вспыхивают яростью; ибо это бесчестье не только личная обида, но и попрание дхармы и достоинства, подобающего добродетельной женщине.
संजय उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse highlights that outrage can be ethically grounded when it arises from a clear breach of dharma—here, the humiliation and coercive public exposure of a virtuous wife in the royal court. It frames anger not as mere passion but as a response to moral transgression and dishonor.
Sañjaya reports that the powerful Pāṇḍavas are overwhelmed with anger upon seeing Draupadī (Kṛṣṇā), their lawful and renowned wife, being led into the assembly hall—an act that signals grave insult and injustice and intensifies the conflict between the parties.