Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 14

विदुरस्य कृष्णं प्रति शमोपदेशः

Vidura’s Counsel to Krishna on the Limits of Peace

उभयोश्वाददा: साहामुभयोश्व हिते रत:

ubhayor dadāḥ sahāyam ubhayor hitе rataḥ | āpanne tau dvau pakṣau hi sahāyyaṁ te kṛtaṁ vibho || mādhava dhṛtarāṣṭrasya priyaḥ sambandhī cāsi vai | cakra-gadā-dhara govinda dharmārthau te yathārthataḥ || atha me ’tithyam ādatte na kathaṁ hetur atra te | etad icchāmi śrotuṁ vai ||

Вайшампаяна сказал: «Ты оказал помощь обеим сторонам и предан благу и тех и других. Когда эти две партии вступили в распрю, ты поддержал их. О Мадхава, ты также — дорогой родственник царя Дхритараштры. О Говинда, носящий диск и палицу, тебе в полноте и истинно ведомы дхарма и артха. Почему же ты отказываешься принять моё гостеприимство? Я желаю услышать причину».

ubhayosof both (sides)
ubhayos:
Adhikarana
TypeAdjective
Rootubhaya
Formn/a, Genitive, Dual
caand
ca:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootca
adadāḥyou gave
adadāḥ:
TypeVerb
Rootdā (dadāti)
FormImperfect (Laṅ), 2, Singular, Parasmaipada
sahāaid, assistance
sahā:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootsahā
FormFeminine, Accusative, Singular
ubhayosof both (sides)
ubhayos:
Adhikarana
TypeAdjective
Rootubhaya
Formn/a, Genitive, Dual
caand
ca:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootca
hitein the welfare/benefit
hite:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Roothita
FormNeuter, Locative, Singular
rataḥengaged, devoted
rataḥ:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootrata
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular

वैशम्पायन उवाच

V
Vaiśampāyana
M
Mādhava (Kṛṣṇa)
G
Govinda (Kṛṣṇa)
D
Dhṛtarāṣṭra
C
cakra (discus)
G
gadā (mace)

Educational Q&A

The verse highlights ethical statesmanship: one who truly knows dharma and artha can act for the welfare of all parties, yet must also explain choices that appear to violate social duties like accepting hospitality. It frames Kṛṣṇa as impartial and principled, accountable to moral reasoning rather than mere factional loyalty.

Vaiśampāyana narrates a moment where Kṛṣṇa is addressed as having aided both factions in the Kuru dispute and being dear to Dhṛtarāṣṭra. The speaker questions why Kṛṣṇa declines the offered hospitality and asks him to state the reason—setting up a diplomatic-ethical explanation in the lead-up to war.