Shloka 2
Strī-dharma: Śiva’s Inquiry, Umā’s Consultation, and Gaṅgā’s Instruction
परदाररतिर्यश्न यश्व वन्ध्यामुपासते । ब्रह्मस्वं हरते यश्ष समदोषा भवन्ति ते,जो परायी स्त्रीमें आसक्त है, जो वन्ध्या स्त्रीका सेवन करता है तथा जो ब्राह्मणका धन हर लेता है--ये तीनों समान दोषके भागी होते हैं
paradāra-ratir yaś ca vandhyām upāsate | brahmasvaṁ harate yaś ca sama-doṣā bhavanti te ||
Локаша сказал: Тот, кто вожделеет жену другого, тот, кто ищет плотского союза с бесплодной женщиной, и тот, кто похищает имущество брахмана, — все трое считаются повинными в одном и том же нравственном проступке.
लोगश उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse equates three acts as equally blameworthy: adultery (attachment to another’s wife), improper sexual conduct (consorting with a barren woman, presented here as a censured act), and stealing a Brāhmaṇa’s property. It underscores that violations of sexual restraint and violations against the sanctity of the Brāhmaṇa’s wealth are serious breaches of dharma.
In the Anuśāsana Parva’s didactic setting, Lokaśa delivers a moral classification of wrong actions. Rather than advancing plot, the passage functions as instruction—grouping certain behaviors together to warn the listener about comparable ethical consequences.