राजा राष्ट्रेश्वरं कृत्वा धृतराष्ट्रोड्द्य शोचति । हमलोग अवध्य नरेशोंका वध करके संसारमें निन्दाके पात्र हो गये। राजा धृतराष्ट्र इस कुलका विनाश करनेवाले दुर्बुद्धि एवं पापात्मा दुर्योधनको इस राष्ट्रका स्वामी बनाकर आज शोककी आगमें जल रहे हैं
rājā rāṣṭreśvaraṁ kṛtvā dhṛtarāṣṭro ’dya śocati | vayam avadhya-nareśānāṁ vadhaṁ kṛtvā saṁsāre nindā-pātrāṇi jātāḥ | rājā dhṛtarāṣṭraḥ asya kulasya vināśa-kāriṇaṁ durbuddhiṁ pāpātmānaṁ duryodhanaṁ rāṣṭrasya svāminaṁ kṛtvā adya śoka-agnau dahyate ||
Yudhiṣṭhira disse: “Tendo feito de Duryodhana o senhor do reino, o rei Dhṛtarāṣṭra agora se aflige. E nós também—por termos matado reis que não deveriam ter sido mortos—tornamo-nos alvo de censura no mundo. Dhṛtarāṣṭra, após nomear soberano deste país aquele Duryodhana de mente perversa e alma pecadora, o próprio agente da ruína de sua linhagem, hoje é consumido pelo fogo da tristeza.”
युधिछिर उवाच
Power entrusted to an unrighteous heir brings ruin to the family and suffering to the ruler; moreover, even a ‘victorious’ side can incur moral blame when violence crosses dharmic limits—hence Yudhiṣṭhira’s emphasis on responsibility, restraint, and the ethical cost of war.
In Śānti Parva, after the war, Yudhiṣṭhira reflects on the catastrophe: Dhṛtarāṣṭra is tormented because he made Duryodhana sovereign, and Yudhiṣṭhira confesses that their killing of many kings has made them targets of public censure, intensifying the postwar moral crisis.