Shloka 52
मृत्यु-काल-प्रबोधनम् (Instruction on Mortality, Time, and Truth) — Mahābhārata, Śānti-parva 169
स तत्र न्यवसद् विप्रो घृणी किज्चिदसंस्पृशन् | क्षुधितश्छन्द्यमानो5पि भोजनं नाभ्यनन्दत
sa tatra nyavasad vipro ghṛṇī kiñcid asaṁspṛśan | kṣudhitaś chandyamāno 'pi bhojanaṁ nābhyanandata ||
Bhīṣma disse: O brâmane compassivo permaneceu ali, mas não tocou em coisa alguma daquele lugar. Embora estivesse com fome e fosse repetidamente instado a comer, ainda assim não consentiu em aceitar o alimento dali — sinal de uma deliberada contenção ética, e não de simples falta de apetite.
भीष्म उवाच
Educational Q&A
Ethical discipline can require refusing even legitimate comforts: the brahmin’s compassion does not override his commitment to a principle of purity or non-acceptance, showing that dharma may demand restraint despite hunger and social pressure.
A compassionate brahmin stays at a place (at Gautama’s urging) but avoids contact with the household’s things and refuses to eat their food, even though he is hungry and repeatedly requested—indicating a purposeful vow or moral boundary.