धृतराष्ट्रस्य मूर्च्छा तथा द्रोणविषयकप्रश्नाः
Dhṛtarāṣṭra’s Fainting and Questions Concerning Droṇa
ततो द्रोणं समारोहत् पार्षत: पापकर्मकृत् । निश्चय ही अर्जुनने अपने सीधे जानेवाले बाणोंके द्वारा अन्य रथियोंको आगे बढ़नेसे रोक दिया था। इसीलिये पापकर्मा धृष्टद्युम्न द्रोणाचार्यपर चढ़ाई कर सका
tato droṇaṃ samārohat pārṣataḥ pāpakarmakṛt | niścayaṃ hi arjunena ātmanaḥ sīdhe jānevāle bāṇaiḥ anyān rathinaḥ agre vardhanāt rokitāḥ | tasmāt pāpakarmā dhṛṣṭadyumnaḥ droṇācāryopari caḍhāīṃ kartum aśakat |
Dhṛtarāṣṭra disse: Então o filho de Pṛṣata—Dṛṣṭadyumna, cujos atos aqui são marcados como pecaminosos—avançou contra Droṇa. Pois Arjuna, com suas flechas de voo reto, havia contido de modo decisivo os demais guerreiros de carro, impedindo-os de avançar; por isso Dṛṣṭadyumna, aproveitando aquela abertura, pôde lançar o assalto contra Droṇācārya.
धृतराष्ट उवाच
The passage highlights the ethical tension in war: tactical actions (Arjuna restraining other chariot-warriors) can enable decisive confrontations, and the narrator’s moral labeling of an agent as 'pāpakarmakṛt' shows how the epic frames certain battlefield acts as ethically charged, not merely strategic.
Dṛṣṭadyumna advances to attack Droṇa. This becomes possible because Arjuna has effectively held back other chariot-warriors with his direct, straight-flying arrows, preventing them from moving forward and thereby opening the way for Dṛṣṭadyumna’s assault on Droṇa.