Adhyāya 90: Babhruvāhana’s Reception and the Commencement of Yudhiṣṭhira’s Aśvamedha
नाविद्यत तदा विप्रा: संचयस्तन्निबोधत । क्षीणौषधिसमावेशे द्रव्यहीनो5भवत् तदा,ब्राह्मणो! सुनो। एक समय वहाँ बड़ा भयंकर अकाल पड़ा। उन दिनों उन धर्मात्मा ब्राह्मणके पास अन्नका संग्रह तो था नहीं, खेतोंका अन्न भी सूख गया था। अतः वे सर्वथा निर्धन हो गये थे
na avidyat tadā viprāḥ sañcayas tan nibodhata | kṣīṇauṣadhi-samāveśe dravya-hīno 'bhavat tadā brāhmaṇo, suno | eka-samaye tatra mahān bhayaṅkaraḥ akālaḥ apatat | teṣu dineṣu dharmātmanaḥ brāhmaṇasya anna-sañcayo na āsīt, kṣetra-annaṃ ca śuṣyati sma | ataḥ sa sarvathā nirdhano 'bhavat |
Nakula disse: “Compreende isto: naquele tempo os brāhmaṇas não tinham provisões armazenadas. Quando as ervas e as plantações definharam, aquele brāhmaṇa ficou sem qualquer recurso, ó filho. De fato, uma grande e terrível fome abateu-se ali. Naqueles dias, o brāhmaṇa justo não possuía reserva de grão, e o produto dos campos secou; assim, tornou-se completamente empobrecido.”
नकुल उवाच
The verse foregrounds how external calamity (famine) can strip even a righteous person of material support, setting the ethical stage for dharmic choices under scarcity—where virtue is tested not in abundance but in deprivation.
Nakula describes a severe famine: crops and herbs have dried up, there is no stored grain among the brahmins, and a particular righteous brahmin becomes completely destitute—preparing the context for subsequent actions and moral decisions.