Adhyāya 48: Brahmopadeśa on Prāṇāyāma, Sāttvika Vṛtti, and the Sattva–Kṣetrajña Question
तथैवैकत्वनानात्वमिष्यते विदुषां नय: । मशकोदुम्बरे चैक्यं पृथक्त्वमपि दृश्यते,इसी प्रकार दूसरे विद्वानोंका निर्णय दोनोंके एकत्व और नानात्वको स्वीकार करता है; क्योंकि मशक और उदुम्बरकी एकता और पृथक्ता देखी जाती है
tathaivaikatva-nānātvam iṣyate viduṣāṃ nayaḥ | maśakodumbare caikyaṃ pṛthaktvam api dṛśyate ||
“Do mesmo modo, a conclusão ponderada dos eruditos aceita tanto a unidade quanto a diversidade. Pois, no caso do mosquito e do udumbara (figueira de cacho), vê-se tanto a sua ‘unidade’ (por estarem ligados) quanto a sua separação (por serem entidades distintas).”
वायुदेव उवाच
The verse teaches that a mature philosophical view can accommodate both unity and diversity: things may be distinct in form and function, yet connected or ‘one’ in dependence, relation, or underlying reality.
Vāyudeva is instructing through an analogy. By pointing to the gnat and the udumbara, he illustrates how learned thinkers justify accepting apparently opposing descriptions—oneness and separateness—depending on the standpoint.