Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 16

आदि पर्व — अध्याय ८३: ययाति-इन्द्र-संवादः तथा अष्टक-प्रश्नः

Yayāti–Indra Dialogue and Aṣṭaka’s Inquiry

अभिगम्य च शर्मिष्ठां देवयान्यब्रवीदिदम्‌ । वैशम्पायनजी कहते हैं--जनमेजय! पवित्र मुसकानवाली देवयानीने जब सुना कि शर्मिष्ठाके पुत्र हुआ है, तब वह दुःखसे पीड़ित हो शर्मिष्ठाके व्यवहारको लेकर बड़ी चिन्ता करने लगी। वह शर्मिष्ठाके पास गयी और इस प्रकार बोली,वैशम्पायन उवाच इत्युक्त्वा सहितास्ते तु राजानमुपचक्रमु: । नाभ्यनन्दत तान्‌ राजा देवयान्यास्तदान्तिके वैशम्पायनजी कहते हैं--ऐसा कहकर वे सब बालक एक साथ राजाके समीप आ गये; परंतु उस समय देवयानीके निकट राजाने उनका अभिनन्दन नहीं किया--उन्हें गोदमें नहीं उठाया

abhigamya ca śarmiṣṭhāṃ devayāny abravīd idam | vaiśampāyana uvāca ity uktvā sahitās te tu rājānam upacakramuḥ | nābhyanandata tān rājā devayānyās tadāntike ||

Disse Vaiśampāyana: Devayānī aproximou-se de Śarmiṣṭhā e lhe falou estas palavras. E ainda, disse Vaiśampāyana: Tendo assim falado, todos aqueles rapazes, juntos, aproximaram-se do rei; mas então, com Devayānī ali ao lado, o rei não os acolheu—não os recebeu com afeição. A cena ressalta como o ciúme e a parcialidade dentro de uma casa podem distorcer a conduta de um governante, convertendo o calor natural de um pai numa demonstração calculada, moldada pelo temor do conflito e pela preocupação com o status.

अभिगम्यhaving approached
अभिगम्य:
Adhikarana
TypeVerb
Rootअभि-गम्
Formल्यप् (क्त्वा-प्रत्ययार्थे), कर्तरि, पूर्वकाले (having done)
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
शर्मिष्ठाम्Śarmiṣṭhā (object)
शर्मिष्ठाम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootशर्मिष्ठा
FormFeminine, Accusative, Singular
देवयानीDevayānī
देवयानी:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootदेवयानी
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular
अब्रवीत्said/spoke
अब्रवीत्:
TypeVerb
Rootब्रू
FormImperfect (लङ्), 3rd, Singular, Parasmaipada
इदम्this
इदम्:
Karma
TypePronoun
Rootइदम्
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular

वैशम्पायन उवाच

V
Vaiśampāyana
D
Devayānī
Ś
Śarmiṣṭhā
T
the king (Yayāti, implied by context)
T
the boys/sons (unnamed here)

Educational Q&A

The passage highlights how attachment, jealousy, and concern for rank can compromise dharma in family life and governance: even a king may withhold rightful affection and fairness when pressured by domestic rivalry, showing that ethical steadiness is tested most sharply within the household.

Devayānī approaches Śarmiṣṭhā to speak to her; then the narrative shows a group of boys approaching the king, but the king—while Devayānī is nearby—does not welcome them, suggesting tension and partiality connected to Devayānī and Śarmiṣṭhā’s competing positions in the household.