Shloka 5
Ādi-parva Adhyāya 116 — Pāṇḍu’s Transgression of the Curse and Mādrī’s Final Charge
कथं तु सम्भवस्तस्या दुःशलाया वदस्व मे । यथावदिह वितप्रर्षे परं मेडत्र कुतूहलम्,यदि महर्षिने उक्त मांसपिण्डके सौ भाग किये और यदि सुबलपुत्री गान्धारीने किसी प्रकार फिर गर्भ धारण या प्रसव नहीं किया, तो उस दु:शला नामवाली कनन््याका जन्म किस प्रकार हुआ? ब्रह्मर्ष! यह सब यथार्थरूपसे मुझे बताइये। मुझे इस विषयमें कौतूहल हो रहा है
kathaṃ tu sambhavastasyā duḥśalāyā vadasva me | yathāvad iha viprarṣe paraṃ me 'tra kutūhalam ||
Janamejaya disse: “Dize-me, então, como Duḥśalā veio a nascer. Ó melhor dos videntes entre os brâmanes, explica aqui com exatidão como tudo se passou, pois estou profundamente curioso sobre este assunto—se o sábio dividiu o bolo de carne em cem partes, e se Gāndhārī, filha de Subala, não voltou a conceber nem a dar à luz de qualquer outro modo, por que meio nasceu a menina chamada Duḥśalā? Relata-me a verdade.”
जनमेजय उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse models disciplined inquiry: when an account seems internally inconsistent, the listener respectfully asks for a precise explanation. It highlights the epic’s concern for truthful narration (yathāvat) and careful transmission of lineage-history.
Janamejaya asks the sage-narrator to clarify how Duḥśalā was born, since earlier it was said that Gāndhārī’s single mass of flesh was divided into a hundred portions—raising the question of how a daughter could be born if there were only a hundred parts and no further conception.