Daṇḍa as the Foundation of Social Order (दण्डप्रतिष्ठा)
आततायी हि यो हन्यादाततायिनमागतम् । न तेन भ्रूणहा स स्यान्मन्युस्तं मन्युमारछति
arjuna uvāca | ātatāyī hi yo hanyād ātatāyinam āgatam | na tena bhrūṇahā sa syān manyus taṃ manyum ṛcchati ||
ହାତରେ ଅସ୍ତ୍ର ଧରି ମାରିବାକୁ ଆସିଥିବା ସେହି ଆତତାୟୀକୁ ଯଦି କେହି ପ୍ରତିରୋଧରେ ବଧ କରେ, ତେଣୁ ସେ ଭ୍ରୂଣହତ୍ୟାର ପାପର ଭାଗୀ ହୁଏ ନାହିଁ; କାରଣ ହିଂସାକୁ ଉଦ୍ୟତ ଆକ୍ରମଣକାରୀର କ୍ରୋଧ ହିଁ ରକ୍ଷକଙ୍କ ମନରେ ମଧ୍ୟ ସେଇ କ୍ଷଣେ କ୍ରୋଧ ଜଗାଇ ଦିଏ।
अजुन उवाच
Killing an armed aggressor who comes to murder is treated as a dharmic act of defense, not as a grievous sin like bhrūṇa-hatyā; moral culpability is mitigated because the attacker’s violent intent and wrath drive the confrontation.
Arjuna argues a point of dharma: when a person is confronted by an ātatāyin (a deadly assailant), slaying that aggressor in response does not make the defender a ‘bhrūṇahā’; he frames it as a compelled defensive act arising from the attacker’s aggression.