अश्वत्थाम-शापः, परिक्षिद्भविष्यत्, मणि-न्यासः
Aśvatthāman’s Curse, Parikṣit’s Future, and the Mani’s Restitution
हतो दुर्योधन: पापो राज्यस्य परिपन्थिक: । दुःशासनस्य रुधिरं पीत॑ विस्फुरतो मया
hato duryodhanaḥ pāpo rājyasya paripanthi-kaḥ | duḥśāsanasya rudhiraṃ pītaṃ visphurato mayā ||
ବୈଶମ୍ପାୟନ କହିଲେ— “ଆମ ରାଜ୍ୟର ପଥରୋଧକ ସେ ପାପୀ ଦୁର୍ଯ୍ୟୋଧନ ନିହତ ହୋଇଛି। ଏବଂ ଦୁଃଶାସନ ଛଟପଟାଉଥିବାବେଳେ ମୁଁ ତାହାର ରକ୍ତ ପାନ କରିଥିଲି। ଏହିପରି ଭାବେ ବୈରର ପୂର୍ଣ୍ଣ ପ୍ରତିଶୋଧ ହୋଇଗଲା। ଏବେ କଥା କହିବାକୁ ଇଚ୍ଛା କରୁଥିବାମାନେ ମଧ୍ୟ ଆମକୁ ନିନ୍ଦା କରିପାରିବେ ନାହିଁ। ଦ୍ରୋଣପୁତ୍ର ଅଶ୍ୱତ୍ଥାମାକୁ ଜୟ କରି ମଧ୍ୟ, ସେ ବ୍ରାହ୍ମଣ ଓ ଗୁରୁପୁତ୍ର—ଏହି ଗୌରବରୁ ମାତ୍ର ଆମେ ତାକୁ ଜୀବନ୍ତ ଛାଡ଼ିଦେଲୁ।”
वैशम्पायन उवाच
The verse highlights the moral tension between righteous retribution and excess: vengeance is claimed as ‘fulfilled,’ yet the imagery of drinking blood underscores how war can push even justified anger toward transgressive violence; simultaneously, sparing Aśvatthāman due to brāhmaṇa-status and guru-lineage shows dharma operating as a restraint even amid hatred.
A speaker (reported by Vaiśampāyana) declares that Duryodhana has been killed and that Duḥśāsana’s blood was drunk while he writhed—presented as repayment for past wrongs; the statement adds that Aśvatthāman, though defeated, was left alive out of respect for his being a brāhmaṇa and the son of Droṇa.