उपायैः पूर्ववधकथनम् / Strategic Justifications for Prior Eliminations
द्रोणमेवा भ्यवर्तन्त पुरस्कृत्य शिखण्डिनम् । प्रहार करनेमें कुशल छ: हजार प्रभद्रक और पांचाल योद्धा भी शिखण्डीको आगे करके द्रोणाचार्यपर ही चढ़ आये
droṇam evābhyavartanta puraskṛtya śikhaṇḍinam | prahāra-karaṇe kuśalāḥ ṣaṭ-sahasrāḥ prabhadrakāḥ pāñcālā yoddhā api śikhaṇḍinaṃ agre kṛtvā droṇācāryam eva cāḍhāyayan |
ସଞ୍ଜୟ କହିଲେ—ଶିଖଣ୍ଡୀଙ୍କୁ ଅଗ୍ରଭାଗରେ ରଖି ସେମାନେ ସିଧା ଦ୍ରୋଣାଚାର୍ଯ୍ୟଙ୍କ ଉପରେ ଅଗ୍ରସର ହେଲେ। ପ୍ରହାରରେ କୁଶଳ ଛଅ ହଜାର ପ୍ରଭଦ୍ରକ ଓ ପାଞ୍ଚାଳ ଯୋଦ୍ଧାମାନେ ମଧ୍ୟ ଶିଖଣ୍ଡୀଙ୍କୁ ଆଗରେ କରି ଦ୍ରୋଣାଚାର୍ଯ୍ୟଙ୍କ ଉପରେ ଝାପି ପଡ଼ିଲେ।
संजय उवाच
The verse highlights a recurring Mahābhārata tension: victory in war often depends on exploiting an opponent’s dharmic limits. Droṇa’s moral hesitation regarding Śikhaṇḍin becomes a strategic vulnerability, raising ethical questions about whether tactical necessity can justify morally ambiguous means.
The Pāṇḍava-aligned forces—six thousand Prabhadrakas along with Pāñcāla warriors—advance directly on Droṇa, deliberately placing Śikhaṇḍin at the front. This formation is meant to blunt Droṇa’s resistance and enable a concentrated assault on him.