HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 17Shloka 13
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Shraddhatraya Vibhaga Yoga, Shloka 13

Shraddhatraya Vibhaga Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 13 illustration

विधिहीनमसृष्टान्नं मन्त्रहीनमदक्षिणम् । श्रद्धाविरहितं यज्ञं तामसं परिचक्षते ॥ १७.१३ ॥

vidhi-hīnam asṛṣṭānnaṃ mantra-hīnam adakṣiṇam | śraddhā-virahitaṃ yajñaṃ tāmasaṃ paricakṣate || 17.13 ||

ଯେ ଯଜ୍ଞ ଶାସ୍ତ୍ରବିଧିହୀନ, ଅନ୍ନଦାନହୀନ, ମନ୍ତ୍ରହୀନ, ଦକ୍ଷିଣାହୀନ ଏବଂ ଶ୍ରଦ୍ଧାହୀନ, ସେହି ଯଜ୍ଞକୁ ତାମସ ବୋଲି କୁହାଯାଏ।

जो यज्ञ शास्त्रविधि से रहित, अन्नदान से रहित, मन्त्र से रहित, दक्षिणा से रहित और श्रद्धा से रहित होता है, उसे तामस कहते हैं।

A sacrifice lacking prescribed procedure, lacking proper distribution of food, lacking mantra, lacking honorarium/gift, and lacking faith—this is called tamasic.

‘Asṛṣṭānna’ is variously glossed as ‘without food-offering’ or ‘without distribution of food (to participants/recipients).’ ‘Dakṣiṇā’ may be a priestly fee in ritual context, or more broadly a due gift; academic translations often keep it neutral as ‘gift/fee.’

विधिहीनम्devoid of prescribed rule/ritual injunction
विधिहीनम्:
Rootविधि + हीन
असृष्टान्नम्with food not properly distributed/offered
असृष्टान्नम्:
Rootअसृष्ट + अन्न
मन्त्रहीनम्without (proper) mantras
मन्त्रहीनम्:
Rootमन्त्र + हीन
अदक्षिणम्without priestly fee/gift (dakṣiṇā)
अदक्षिणम्:
Rootअ + दक्षिणा
श्रद्धाविरहितम्devoid of faith
श्रद्धाविरहितम्:
Rootश्रद्धा + विरहित
यज्ञम्sacrifice; ritual offering
यज्ञम्:
Karma
Rootयज्ञ
तामसम्tamasic; of the quality of tamas
तामसम्:
Rootतामस
परिचक्षतेthey call; they describe
परिचक्षते:
Root√चक्ष् (आख्याने) + परि
Krishna
Tamas-guṇaŚraddhā (faith/commitment)YajñaRitual normativity (vidhi)
Neglect of form and meaningErosion of intentionalityFaith as orientationRitual as social-ethical practice

FAQs

The verse treats ‘faith’ as committed attention and seriousness; when absent, actions become mechanical or careless, reflecting tamasic disengagement.

Tamas obscures understanding and order; the listed deficiencies portray a practice detached from both normative structure and inner orientation.

It completes the threefold classification of sacrifice (sattvic/rajasic/tamasic) following the earlier dietary triad.

It can be read as a critique of performative or poorly grounded practices—religious or secular—done without care, competence, or sincere commitment.