Shloka 91
Ulūka’s Provocation and Keśava’s Counter-Message (उलूकदूत्ये केशवप्रत्युत्तरम्)
अप्रियाणां च वचन प्रब्र॒ुवत्सु पुन: पुनः । अमर्ष दर्शयस्व त्वममर्षो होव पौरुषम्,“हमलोग बार-बार तुमलोगोंके प्रति अप्रिय वचन कहते हैं। तुम हमारे ऊपर अपना अमर्ष तो दिखाओ; क्योंकि अमर्ष ही पौरुष है
apriyāṇāṃ ca vacanaṃ prabrūvatsu punaḥ punaḥ | amarṣaṃ darśayasva tvam amarṣo hova pauruṣam ||
သဉ္ဇယက ပြောသည်– «ငါတို့က မင်းတို့အပေါ် မနှစ်သက်ဖွယ် စကား들을 ထပ်ခါထပ်ခါ ပြောနေသော်လည်း၊ မင်းက ငါတို့အပေါ် မခံမရပ်နိုင်သော ဒေါသ (အမර්ෂ) ကို ပြသလော့။ အရှက်ခွဲမှုနှင့် အမှားအယွင်းကို မခံနိုင်ခြင်းပင် ယောကျာ်းသတ္တိ၏ လက္ခဏာဖြစ်သည်»။
संजय उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse frames amarṣa (spirited indignation at insult or injustice) as a component of pauruṣa (manly valor), reflecting a Kṣatriya ideal: one should not passively tolerate repeated affronts, especially when honor and duty are at stake.
In the tense pre-war negotiations of the Udyoga Parva, harsh and displeasing words are being exchanged repeatedly. Sañjaya reports a stance that such repeated affronts should provoke visible indignation, implying that restraint has limits and that continued insult pushes matters toward open conflict.