Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 9

Mātali’s Proposal for Guṇakeśī and Sumukha’s Audience with Indra

वासुकिस्तक्षकश्नैव कर्कोटकधनंजयौ । कालियो नहुषश्लैव कम्बलाश्वतरावुभौ

nārada uvāca | vāsukis takṣakaś caiva karkoṭaka-dhanañjayau | kāliyo nahuṣaś caiva kambalāśvatarāv ubhau ||

Narada said: “Vāsuki and Takṣaka, as well as Karkoṭaka and Dhanañjaya; Kāliya and Nahuṣa too; and the pair Kambala and Aśvatara—these are among the many Nāgas descended from Kaśyapa.” In context, the verse functions as a formal enumeration of eminent serpent-lords, underscoring the vastness and legitimacy of Kaśyapa’s lineage and the ordered, genealogical view of the world that supports dharmic governance and alliance-making.

वासुकिःVasuki (a serpent king)
वासुकिः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootवासुकि
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
तक्षकःTakshaka
तक्षकः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootतक्षक
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
श्नैवalso/indeed (as given in the text; likely a scribal/orthographic variant)
श्नैव:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootश्नैव
कर्कोटकःKarkotaka
कर्कोटकः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootकर्कोटक
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
धनंजयौthe two named Dhananjaya (or Dhananjaya and another paired name, as dual)
धनंजयौ:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootधनंजय
FormMasculine, Nominative, Dual
कालियःKaliya
कालियः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootकालिय
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
नहुषःNahusha
नहुषः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootनहुष
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
श्लैवalso/indeed (as given in the text; likely a scribal/orthographic variant)
श्लैव:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootश्लैव
कम्बलKambala
कम्बल:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootकम्बल
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
अश्वतरौthe two Ashvataras / Ashvatara (dual form as given)
अश्वतरौ:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootअश्वतर
FormMasculine, Nominative, Dual
उभौboth
उभौ:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootउभ
FormMasculine, Nominative, Dual

नारद उवाच

N
Nārada
V
Vāsuki
T
Takṣaka
K
Karkoṭaka
D
Dhanañjaya (Nāga)
K
Kāliya
N
Nahuṣa (Nāga)
K
Kambala
A
Aśvatara
K
Kaśyapa

Educational Q&A

The verse reinforces a dharmic worldview in which social and cosmic legitimacy is grounded in recognized lineages; naming eminent Nāgas situates them within Kaśyapa’s sanctioned descent and highlights ordered plurality rather than chaos.

Nārada is enumerating prominent Nāga chiefs—Vāsuki, Takṣaka, and others—within a broader catalogue of Kaśyapa’s descendants, a common epic device to map alliances, status, and the scale of the beings involved.