The Birth and Consecration of Skanda (Kartikeya) at Kurukshetra
एतानि भूतानि गणांश्च मातरो दृष्ट्वा महात्मा विनतातनूजः ददौ मयूरं स्वसुतं महाजवं तथारुणस्ताम्रचूडं च पुत्रम्
etāni bhūtāni gaṇāṃśca mātaro dṛṣṭvā mahātmā vinatātanūjaḥ dadau mayūraṃ svasutaṃ mahājavaṃ tathāruṇastāmracūḍaṃ ca putram
Melihat makhluk-makhluk itu—para gaṇa dan para Ibu—tokoh agung, putera Vinatā, mengurniakan sebagai pengiring: burung merak, puteranya sendiri yang amat pantas; dan demikian juga Aruṇa mengurniakan puteranya, Tāmra-cūḍa.
{ "primaryRasa": "adbhuta", "secondaryRasa": "vira", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
Yes. In Purāṇic usage, “Vinatā’s son” is a standard epithet of Garuḍa. The pairing with Aruṇa (also a son of Vinatā) further confirms the identification.
The verb “dadau” here functions like ‘assigned/appointed’ within a catalogue of attendants linked to a sacred complex. The peacock (mayūra) is a potent emblem in Indian religious iconography (notably as Skanda’s vāhana), and its inclusion suggests a layered retinue where bird-beings and divine vehicles are stationed as guardians/markers of sanctity.
Tāmra-cūḍa (‘copper-crested’) is presented as a named avian/attendant figure. By making him Aruṇa’s son, the text anchors him in a recognized mythic genealogy, thereby legitimizing his presence in the tīrtha’s sacral roster.