Śiva–Hari–Rudra–Vidhīnāṃ Tattva-nirṇayaḥ
Identity of Śiva, Viṣṇu, Rudra, and Brahmā; Nirguṇa–Saguṇa Reconciliation
ऋषय ऊचुः । शिवः को वा हरिः को वा रुद्रः को वा विधिश्च कः । एतेषु निर्गुणः को वा ह्येतं नश्छिन्धि संशयम्
ṛṣaya ūcuḥ | śivaḥ ko vā hariḥ ko vā rudraḥ ko vā vidhiśca kaḥ | eteṣu nirguṇaḥ ko vā hyetaṃ naśchindhi saṃśayam
Para resi berkata: “Siapakah sebenarnya Śiva? Siapakah Hari (Viṣṇu)? Siapakah Rudra? Dan siapakah Vidhī (Brahmā)? Antara mereka, siapakah yang benar-benar nirguṇa—melampaui segala sifat? Mohon hapuskan keraguan kami ini.”
The sages (ṛṣis) at Naimiṣāraṇya
Tattva Level: pashu
Significance: The verse frames a jñāna-tīrtha: resolving doctrinal doubt about Śiva/Viṣṇu/Rudra/Brahmā and nirguṇatva, a prerequisite for right devotion and liberation.
Role: teaching
It frames the core theological inquiry: behind divine names and roles (creator, sustainer, dissolver), who is the transcendent nirguṇa reality—pointing the listener toward the supreme Pati (Śiva) who is beyond guṇas yet worshipped through accessible forms.
By asking who is nirguṇa among the deities, the verse prepares the teaching that the formless absolute can be approached through saguna manifestations—classically the Śiva-liṅga (including Jyotirliṅgas) as a sanctified focus for devotion and realization.
The practical takeaway is inquiry joined with upāsanā: contemplate the nirguṇa truth while worshipping Śiva in saguna form—especially japa of the Pañcākṣarī “Om Namaḥ Śivāya,” supported by Śiva-pūjā and inner meditation on the guṇa-transcending Lord.