Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 27

Adhyāya 160: Arjuna’s Envoy-Message—Critique of Borrowed Valor and Pre-dawn Mobilization

नतु पर्यायधर्मेण राज्यं प्राप्रोति मानुष: । मनसैवानुकूलानि विधाता कुरुते वशे

na tu paryāya-dharmeṇa rājyaṃ prāpnoti mānuṣaḥ | manasaivānukūlāni vidhātā kurute vaśe ||

Ulūka berkata: “Seseorang tidak memperoleh kedaulatan hanya dengan dharma yang sekadar nama dan adat lahiriah. Sebaliknya, Sang Penentu—takdir itu sendiri—dengan satu kehendak semata, membengkokkan peristiwa dan manusia kepada yang menguntungkan, lalu menundukkannya di bawah kuasa.”

not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
तुbut/indeed
तु:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootतु
पर्यायधर्मेणby (mere) conventional/nominal duty
पर्यायधर्मेण:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootपर्यायधर्म
FormMasculine, Instrumental, Singular
राज्यम्kingdom/sovereignty
राज्यम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootराज्य
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
प्राप्नोतिattains/obtains
प्राप्नोति:
TypeVerb
Rootप्र + आप्
FormPresent, Third, Singular, Parasmaipada
मानुषःa human (person)
मानुषः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootमानुष
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
मनसाby the mind
मनसा:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootमनस्
FormNeuter, Instrumental, Singular
एवonly/indeed
एव:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootएव
अनुकूलानिfavorable (things)
अनुकूलानि:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootअनुकूल
FormNeuter, Accusative, Plural
विधाताthe Disposer/Creator (Fate)
विधाता:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootविधातृ
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
कुरुतेmakes/does
कुरुते:
TypeVerb
Rootकृ
FormPresent, Third, Singular, Atmanepada
वशेin (his) control/under sway
वशे:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootवश
FormMasculine, Locative, Singular

उलूक उवाच

U
Ulūka
V
Vidhātā (Fate/Providence)

Educational Q&A

The verse contrasts outward, merely conventional ‘dharma’ with the decisive force of vidhātā (Providence/Fate): political power is not secured by a token display of righteousness; outcomes are portrayed as being shaped by a higher ordering will that can make circumstances compliant.

In Udyoga Parva, Ulūka speaks as a messenger in the tense pre-war diplomacy. Here he advances a hard-edged, fatalistic argument meant to unsettle moral claims and emphasize that success in gaining or holding a kingdom depends less on professed dharma and more on the overpowering turn of destiny.