Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 55

Vyāghra–Gomāyu Saṃvāda (व्याघ्रगोमायु संवाद) — Testing Character Beneath Appearances

कार्यार्थ भोजनार्थेषु व्रतेषु कृतवान्‌ श्रमम्‌ । यदि विप्रत्ययो होष तदिदं दर्शयाम ते,“उसने तो अपना काम बनाने और पेट भरनेके लिये ही व्रत करनेमें परिश्रम किया है। यदि आपको विश्वास न हो तो यह लीजिये, हम अभी उसके यहाँ से मांस ले आकर दिखाते हैं

kāryārtha-bhojanārtheṣu vrateṣu kṛtavān śramam | yadi vipratyayo hoṣa tad idaṃ darśayāma te ||

Bhishma berkata: “Dia bersusah payah menunaikan nazar hanya untuk melicinkan urusannya dan mengenyangkan perutnya. Jika tuanku masih ragu, maka lihatlah—sekarang juga kami akan membuktikannya dengan membawa daging dari rumahnya sendiri.”

कार्यार्थम्for the sake of work
कार्यार्थम्:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootकार्य + अर्थ
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
भोजनार्थेषुin/for the sake of food (ends)
भोजनार्थेषु:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootभोजन + अर्थ
FormNeuter, Locative, Plural
व्रतेषुin vows/observances
व्रतेषु:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootव्रत
FormNeuter, Locative, Plural
कृतवान्did / has done
कृतवान्:
Karta
TypeVerb
Rootकृ
FormPerfect (periphrastic), Third, Singular, Masculine
श्रमम्effort, toil
श्रमम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootश्रम
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular
यदिif
यदि:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootयदि
विप्रत्ययःdoubt, disbelief
विप्रत्ययः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootविप्रत्यय
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
होःO! (vocative particle)
होः:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootहो
तत्then/that
तत्:
TypePronoun
Rootतद्
FormNeuter, Nominative, Singular
इदम्this
इदम्:
TypePronoun
Rootइदम्
FormNeuter, Nominative, Singular
दर्शयामःwe show
दर्शयामः:
TypeVerb
Rootदृश्
FormPresent, Indicative, First, Plural
तेto you
ते:
Sampradana
TypePronoun
Rootयुष्मद्
FormDative, Singular

भीष्म उवाच

B
Bhishma
M
meat (māṃsa)
H
house (implied: his house)

Educational Q&A

The verse critiques vows performed for selfish ends—practical advantage or mere sustenance—rather than for dharma. It highlights that the ethical value of religious observance depends on intention, not outward display.

Bhishma alleges that a person’s vow-keeping is motivated by gain and appetite, not genuine restraint. To remove the listener’s doubt, he proposes immediate, concrete proof—bringing meat from the person’s house—exposing inconsistency between claimed austerity and actual conduct.