Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 40

Nāradasya Rājadharma-praśnāḥ

Nārada’s Examination of Royal Ethics

कच्चिद्‌ विनयसम्पन्न: कुलपुत्रो बहुश्रुतः । अनसूयुरनुप्रष्टा सत्कृतस्ते पुरोहित:,क्या तुम्हारे पुरोहित विनयशील, कुलीन, बहुज्ञ, विद्वान, दोषदृष्टिसे रहित तथा शास्त्रचर्चामें कुशल हैं? क्या तुम उनका पूर्ण सत्कार करते हो?

kaccid vinayasampannaḥ kulaputro bahuśrutaḥ | anasūyur anupraṣṭā satkṛtas te purohitaḥ ||

Nārada bertanya: “Adakah purohita tuanku terlatih dalam kerendahan hati dan disiplin, berasal daripada keturunan yang baik, serta luas ilmunya? Adakah dia bebas daripada tabiat mencari-cari salah dan mampu bertanya serta menimbang dengan tepat dalam hal pengajian suci? Dan adakah tuanku memuliakannya dengan penghormatan yang sewajarnya?”

कच्चित्whether? (I hope/indeed?)
कच्चित्:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootकच्चित्
विनयसम्पन्नःendowed with humility/discipline
विनयसम्पन्नः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootविनय-सम्पन्न
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
कुलपुत्रःa well-born man (son of a good family)
कुलपुत्रः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootकुलपुत्र
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
बहुश्रुतःwell-learned, much-heard (erudite)
बहुश्रुतः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootबहुश्रुत
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
अनसूयुःfree from envy/carping
अनसूयुः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootअनसूयु
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
अनुप्रष्टाone who inquires appropriately (questioner)
अनुप्रष्टा:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootअनु-प्रष्टृ
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
सत्कृतःhonoured, well-treated
सत्कृतः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootसत्-कृत
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
तेof you/your
ते:
TypePronoun
Rootयुष्मद्
FormGenitive, Singular
पुरोहितःhouse-priest, chaplain
पुरोहितः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootपुरोहित
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular

नारद उवाच

N
Narada
P
purohita (royal chaplain/priest)

Educational Q&A

A ruler’s dharma is strengthened by keeping a learned, humble, non-censorious purohita and by honoring him. Ethical governance requires disciplined scholarship, constructive inquiry, and respect for principled counsel.

Narada, in a sequence of diagnostic questions about good rule and household order, asks whether the king maintains a qualified royal priest-adviser and treats him with proper honor—implying that neglect of such guidance harms dharma and statecraft.