Shloka 7
सभा पर्व, अध्याय ३७ — युधिष्ठिरस्य भीष्मोपदेशः
Yudhiṣṭhira’s Consultation and Bhīṣma’s Counsel in the Assembly
अथ वा वासुदेवो5पि प्रियकामो<नुवृत्तवान् । द्रपदे तिष्ठति कथं माधवो5हति पूजनम्
atha vā vāsudevo 'pi priyakāmo 'nuvṛttavān | drupade tiṣṭhati kathaṁ mādhavo 'rhati pūjanam ||
Śiśupāla berkata: “Atau andaikata Vāsudeva benar-benar seorang yang mahu menyenangkan kamu dan menurut kehendak kamu—itu pun tidak membenarkan pemujaan ini. Kerana selagi Raja Drupada, sahabat terbesar kamu, masih hadir, bagaimana Mādhava berhak menerima penghormatan utama? Dan jika kamu mendakwa kamu menganggap Kṛṣṇa sebagai seorang ācārya, mengapa kamu memuliakan putera Yadu ini sedangkan para guru yang lebih tua—seperti Droṇa—masih ada di sini?”
शिशुपाल उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse foregrounds the dharmic idea of precedence in public honor: in assemblies, respect is expected to follow recognized hierarchies—seniority, benefaction, and established roles (friend, elder, teacher). Śiśupāla uses this norm to argue that honoring Kṛṣṇa over figures like Drupada (as chief ally) or Droṇa (as senior teacher) violates accepted protocol.
During Yudhiṣṭhira’s Rājasūya-related assembly, the question of who should receive the foremost honor becomes contentious. Śiśupāla publicly attacks the decision to honor Kṛṣṇa, offering alternative justifications (Kṛṣṇa as a pleasing follower or as an ācārya) and rejecting them by citing Drupada’s friendship and Droṇa’s seniority as reasons Kṛṣṇa should not receive the highest worship.