वध्यतां साध्वयं पाप: सामात्य इति दुर्मति: । पुत्रस्नेहाभिभूतस्तु हितमुक्तो मनीषिभि:
dhṛtarāṣṭra uvāca |
vadhyatāṃ sādhv ayaṃ pāpaḥ sāmātya iti durmatiḥ |
putrasnehābhibhūtas tu hitam ukto manīṣibhiḥ ||
Dhṛtarāṣṭra berkata: “Sesungguhnya si pendosa yang berakal jahat ini sepatutnya dihukum mati—bersama para menterinya. Namun, ditundukkan oleh kasih sayang terhadap anakku, aku menolak nasihat yang baik yang diucapkan oleh para bijaksana.”
धृतराष्ट उवाच
The verse highlights how parental attachment (putra-sneha) can overpower discernment and lead a ruler to reject wise, beneficial counsel (hita) even when justice demands firm action; it frames moral failure as a choice against dharma under the pressure of personal bonds.
Dhṛtarāṣṭra reflects on his past failure: although the wicked person (implicitly his son Duryodhana) deserved punishment—even along with his circle of ministers—Dhṛtarāṣṭra, driven by affection, did not accept the advice given by wise counsellors, and now voices remorse.